Browsing by Author "Barron P"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

HIV and tuberculosis in prisons in sub-Saharan Africa.
(2016-Sep-17) Telisinghe L; Charalambous S; Topp SM; Herce ME; Hoffmann CJ; Barron P; Schouten EJ; Jahn A; Zachariah R; Harries AD; Beyrer C; Amon JJ; College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Department of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi; International Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Health and Human Rights Division, Human Rights Watch, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels Operational Centre, Operational Research Unit, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.; Field Epidemiology Services, Public Health England, Bristol, UK; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: lily.telisinghe@phe.gov.uk.; Management Sciences for Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Given the dual epidemics of HIV and tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa and evidence suggesting a disproportionate burden of these diseases among detainees in the region, we aimed to investigate the epidemiology of HIV and tuberculosis in prison populations, describe services available and challenges to service delivery, and identify priority areas for programmatically relevant research in sub-Saharan African prisons. To this end, we reviewed literature on HIV and tuberculosis in sub-Saharan African prisons published between 2011 and 2015, and identified data from only 24 of the 49 countries in the region. Where data were available, they were frequently of poor quality and rarely nationally representative. Prevalence of HIV infection ranged from 2·3% to 34·9%, and of tuberculosis from 0·4 to 16·3%; detainees nearly always had a higher prevalence of both diseases than did the non-incarcerated population in the same country. We identified barriers to prevention, treatment, and care services in published work and through five case studies of prison health policies and services in Zambia, South Africa, Malawi, Nigeria, and Benin. These barriers included severe financial and human-resource limitations and fragmented referral systems that prevent continuity of care when detainees cycle into and out of prison, or move between prisons. These challenges are set against the backdrop of weak health and criminal-justice systems, high rates of pre-trial detention, and overcrowding. A few examples of promising practices exist, including routine voluntary testing for HIV and screening for tuberculosis upon entry to South African and the largest Zambian prisons, reforms to pre-trial detention in South Africa, integration of mental health services into a health package in selected Malawian prisons, and task sharing to include detainees in care provision through peer-educator programmes in Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Zambia, and South Africa. However, substantial additional investments are required throughout sub-Saharan Africa to develop country-level policy guidance, build human-resource capacity, and strengthen prison health systems to ensure universal access to HIV and tuberculsosis prevention, treatment, and care of a standard that meets international goals and human rights obligations.
HIV programme sustainability in Southern and Eastern Africa and the changing role of external assistance for health.
(2024-Jan-23) Neel AH; Rodríguez DC; Sikazwe I; Pillay Y; Barron P; Pereira SK; Makakole-Nene S; Bennett SC; Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), 34620 Lukasu Road, Mass Media, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.; SCMN Global Health Consulting, 261 Middel Street, Pretoria 0181, South Africa.
High human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-prevalence countries in Southern and Eastern Africa continue to receive substantial external assistance (EA) for HIV programming, yet countries are at risk of transitioning out of HIV aid without achieving epidemic control. We sought to address two questions: (1) to what extent has HIV EA in the region been programmed and delivered in a way that supports long-term sustainability and (2) how should development agencies change operational approaches to support long-term, sustainable HIV control? We conducted 20 semi-structured key informant interviews with global and country-level respondents coupled with an analysis of Global Fund budget data for Malawi, Uganda, and Zambia (from 2017 until the present). We assessed EA practice along six dimensions of sustainability, namely financial, epidemiological, programmatic, rights-based, structural and political sustainability. Our respondents described HIV systems' vulnerability to donor departure, as well as how development partner priorities and practices have created challenges to promoting long-term HIV control. The challenges exacerbated by EA patterns include an emphasis on treatment over prevention, limiting effects on new infection rates; resistance to service integration driven in part by 'winners' under current EA patterns and challenges in ensuring coverage for marginalized populations; persistent structural barriers to effectively serving key populations and limited capacity among organizations best positioned to respond to community needs; and the need for advocacy given the erosion of political commitment by the long-term and substantive nature of HIV EA. Our recommendations include developing a robust investment case for primary prevention, providing operational support for integration processes, investing in local organizations and addressing issues of political will. While strategies must be locally crafted, our paper provides initial suggestions for how EA partners could change operational approaches to support long-term HIV control and the achievement of universal health coverage.