Browsing by Author "Bozzani FM"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Costs of introducing pneumococcal, rotavirus and a second dose of measles vaccine into the Zambian immunisation programme: Are expansions sustainable?(2016-Jul-29) Griffiths UK; Bozzani FM; Chansa C; Kinghorn A; Kalesha-Masumbu P; Rudd C; Chilengi R; Brenzel L; Schutte C; Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Plot 5032 Great North Road, Lusaka, Zambia.; World Bank, Zambia Country Office, Banc ABC House, Church Road, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ulla.griffiths@lshtm.ac.uk.; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 1300 I Street, NW Suite 200, Washington, DC, United States.; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.; Perinatal Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto, South Africa.; Strategic Development Consulting (SDC), Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.; World Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.BACKGROUND: Introduction of new vaccines in low- and lower middle-income countries has accelerated since Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance was established in 2000. This study sought to (i) estimate the costs of introducing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, rotavirus vaccine and a second dose of measles vaccine in Zambia; and (ii) assess affordability of the new vaccines in relation to Gavi's co-financing and eligibility policies. METHODS: Data on 'one-time' costs of cold storage expansions, training and social mobilisation were collected from the government and development partners. A detailed economic cost study of routine immunisation based on a representative sample of 51 health facilities provided information on labour and vaccine transport costs. Gavi co-financing payments and immunisation programme costs were projected until 2022 when Zambia is expected to transition from Gavi support. The ability of Zambia to self-finance both new and traditional vaccines was assessed by comparing these with projected government health expenditures. RESULTS: 'One-time' costs of introducing the three vaccines amounted to US$ 0.28 per capita. The new vaccines increased annual immunisation programme costs by 38%, resulting in economic cost per fully immunised child of US$ 102. Co-financing payments on average increased by 10% during 2008-2017, but must increase 49% annually between 2017 and 2022. In 2014, the government spent approximately 6% of its health expenditures on immunisation. Assuming no real budget increases, immunisation would account for around 10% in 2022. Vaccines represented 1% of government, non-personnel expenditures for health in 2014, and would be 6% in 2022, assuming no real budget increases. CONCLUSION: While the introduction of new vaccines is justified by expected positive health impacts, long-term affordability will be challenging in light of the current economic climate in Zambia. The government needs to both allocate more resources to the health sector and seek efficiency gains within service provision.Item Cross-sectional assessment of tuberculosis and HIV prevalence in 13 correctional facilities in Zambia.(2021-Sep-27) Kagujje M; Somwe P; Hatwiinda S; Bwalya J; Zgambo T; Thornicroft M; Bozzani FM; Moonga C; Muyoyeta M; Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Tuberculosis Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Tuberculosis Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia mkagujje@gmail.com.; Health directorate, Zambia Correctional Service, Lusaka, Zambia.; Strategic Information Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) and HIV in 13 Zambian correctional facilities. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 13 correctional facilities in seven of the 10 provinces in Zambia. PARTICIPANTS: All incarcerated individuals were eligible for TB and HIV screening and testing. Of the total study population of 9695 individuals, which represent 46.2% of total correctional population at the beginning of the study, 8267 and 8160 were screened for TB and HIV, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: TB and HIV screening and testing was done between July 2018 and February 2019. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: All forms of TB, bacteriologically confirmed TB, drug-resistant TB, HIV. RESULTS: Prevalence of all forms of TB and bacteriologically confirmed TB was 1599 (1340-1894) per 100 000 population and 1056 (847-1301) per 100 000 population, respectively. Among those with bacteriologically confirmed TB, 4.6% (1.3%-11.4%) had drug-resistant TB.There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of all forms of TB, bacteriologically confirmed TB and drug resistant TB between adults and juveniles: (p=0.82), (p=0.23), (p=0.68) respectively. Of the bacteriologically confirmed TB cases, 28.7% were asymptomatic. The prevalence of HIV was 14.3% (13.6%-15.1%). The prevalence of HIV among females was 1.8 times the prevalence of HIV among males (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with the study in 2011 which screened inmates representing 30% of the country's inmate population, then the prevalence of all forms of TB and HIV in correctional facilities has reduced by about 75% and 37.6%, respectively. However, compared with the general population, the prevalence of all forms of TB and HIV was 3.5 and 1.3 times higher, respectively. TB/HIV programmes in correctional facilities need further strengthening to include aspects of juvenile-specific TB programming and gender responsive HIV programming.