Browsing by Author "Brown ER"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Corrigendum to "oral and injectable contraceptive use and HIV acquisition risk among women in four African countries: a secondary analysis of data from a microbicide trial" [Contraception 2016; 93 (1): 25-31].
(2016-Jul) Balkus JE; Brown ER; Hillier SL; Coletti A; Ramjee G; Mgodi N; Makanani B; Reid C; Martinson F; Soto-Torres L; Abdool Karim SS; Chirenje ZM; College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; FHI360, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and the Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.; University of North Carolina Project, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella, South Africa; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.; University of Zimbabwe - University of California San Francisco Research Program, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; HIV Prevention Research Unit, South Africa Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jbalkus@fhcrc.org.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
Oral and injectable contraceptive use and HIV acquisition risk among women in four African countries: a secondary analysis of data from a microbicide trial.
(2016-Jan) Balkus JE; Brown ER; Hillier SL; Coletti A; Ramjee G; Mgodi N; Makanani B; Reid C; Martinson F; Soto-Torres L; Abdool Karim SS; Chirenje ZM; College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; FHI360, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and the Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.; University of North Carolina Project, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella, South Africa; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.; University of Zimbabwe - University of California San Francisco Research Program, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; HIV Prevention Research Unit, South Africa Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jbalkus@fhcrc.org.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of oral and injectable contraceptive use compared to nonhormonal contraceptive use on HIV acquisition among Southern African women enrolled in a microbicide trial. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study using data from women enrolled in HIV Prevention Trials Network protocol 035. At each quarterly visit, participants were interviewed about self-reported contraceptive use and sexual behaviors and underwent HIV testing. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the effect of injectable and oral hormonal contraceptive use on HIV acquisition. RESULTS: The analysis included 2830 participants, of whom 106 became HIV infected (4.07 per 100 person-years). At baseline, 1546 (51%) participants reported using injectable contraceptives and 595 (21%) reported using oral contraceptives. HIV incidence among injectable, oral and nonhormonal contraceptive method users was 4.72, 2.68 and 3.83 per 100 person-years, respectively. Injectable contraceptive use was associated with a nonstatistically significant increased risk of HIV acquisition [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70, 1.96], while oral contraceptive use was associated with a nonstatistically significant decreased risk of HIV acquisition (aHR=0.76; 95% CI 0.37,1.55). CONCLUSION: In this secondary analysis of randomized trial data, a marginal, but nonstatistically significant, increase in HIV risk among women using injectable hormonal contraceptives was observed. No increased HIV risk was observed among women using oral contraceptives. Our findings support the World Health Organization's recommendation that women at high risk for acquiring HIV, including those using progestogen-only injectable contraception, should be strongly advised to always use condoms and other HIV prevention measures. IMPLICATIONS: Among Southern African women participating in an HIV prevention trial, women using injectable hormonal contraceptives had a modest increased risk of HIV acquisition; however, this association was not statistically significant. Continued research on the relationship between widely used hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition is essential.
Predictors of stillbirth in sub-saharan Africa.
(2007-Nov) Chi BH; Wang L; Read JS; Taha TE; Sinkala M; Brown ER; Valentine M; Martinson F; Goldenberg RL; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. bchi@cidrz.org; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and predictors of stillbirth in a predominantly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected African cohort. METHODS: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 024 was a randomized controlled trial of empiric antibiotics to reduce chorioamnionitis-related perinatal HIV transmission. A proportion of HIV-uninfected individuals were enrolled to reduce community-based stigma surrounding the trial. For this analysis, only women who gave birth to singleton infants were included. RESULTS: Of 2,659 women enrolled, 2,434 (92%) mother- child pairs met inclusion criteria. Of these, 2,099 (86%) infants were born to HIV-infected women, and 335 (14%) were born to HIV-uninfected women. The overall stillbirth rate was 32.9 per 1,000 deliveries (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.1-40.7). In univariable analyses, predictors for stillbirth included previous stillbirth (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3), antenatal hemorrhage (OR 14.4, 95% CI 4.3-47.9), clinical chorioamnionitis (OR 20.9, 95% CI 5.1-86.2), and marked polymorphonuclear infiltration on placental histology (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-5.2). When compared with pregnancies longer than 37 weeks, those at 34-37 weeks (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.8-3.4) and those at less than 34 weeks (OR 22.8, 95% CI 13.6-38.2) appeared more likely to result in stillborn delivery. Human immunodeficiency virus infection was not associated with a greater risk for stillbirth in either univariable (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.0) or multivariable (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.38-3.26) analysis. Among HIV-infected women, however, decreasing CD4 cell count was inversely related to stillbirth risk (P=.009). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort, HIV infection was not associated with increased stillbirth risk. Further work is needed to elucidate the relationship between chorioamnionitis and stillbirth in African populations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00021671 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Timing of maternal and neonatal dosing of nevirapine and the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: HIVNET 024.
(2005-Nov-04) Chi BH; Wang L; Read JS; Sheriff M; Fiscus S; Brown ER; Taha TE; Valentine M; Goldenberg R; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. bchi@cidrz.org; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
OBJECTIVE: Despite a growing emphasis worldwide on complex and potent antiretroviral drug regimens for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (MTCT), two-dose nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis remains an important choice in many settings. We analyzed data from a multicenter clinical trial to determine whether timing of maternal or infant NVP was associated with MTCT between delivery and 6 weeks of age (intrapartum/early postnatal transmission; I/EP). METHODS: HIVNET 024 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of empiric antibiotics to reduce chorioamnionitis-associated MTCT. This secondary analysis used data collected in the original randomized trial. Enrolled women were instructed to self-administer NVP at labor onset; infants were to receive a dose within 72 h of birth. RESULTS: Data regarding 1491 mother-infant pairs were analyzed. The overall I/EP HIV-1 transmission rate was 8.1% at 6 weeks. Almost all women (93%) ingested NVP within 24 h of delivery; 90% of infants were given NVP within 48 h after delivery. Variations in mother or infant dose timing did not influence transmission rates, even when the combined pattern of both was taken into account through multivariate analysis. In the subset of women ingesting NVP or= 4 h). CONCLUSION: Variations in the timing of maternal and infant NVP doses (within reasonable proximity to delivery) do not appear to affect the risk of MTCT.