Browsing by Author "Brown S"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Global HIV prevention, care and treatment services for children: a cross-sectional survey from the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium.
    (2023-Mar-13) Vreeman RC; Yiannoutsos CT; Yusoff NKN; Wester CW; Edmonds A; Ofner S; Davies MA; Leroy V; Lumbiganon P; de Menezes Succi RC; Twizere C; Brown S; Bolton-Moore C; Takassi OE; Scanlon M; Martin R; Wools-Kaloustian K; Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation Health (CERPOP), Inserm, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.; Department of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Arnhold Institute for Global Health, New York, New York, USA rachel.vreeman@mssm.edu.; Department of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.; Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.; Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.; Département de Pédiatrie, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.; Indiana University Center for Global Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.; Centre National de Référence en Matière de VIH/SIDA, Bujumbura, Burundi.; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.; Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.; Department of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Arnhold Institute for Global Health, New York, New York, USA.; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    OBJECTIVES: To assess access children with HIV have to comprehensive HIV care services, to longitudinally evaluate the implementation and scale-up of services, and to use site services and clinical cohort data to explore whether access to these services influences retention in care. METHODS: A cross-sectional standardised survey was completed in 2014-2015 by sites providing paediatric HIV care across regions of the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. We developed a comprehensiveness score based on the WHO's nine categories of essential services to categorise sites as 'low' (0-5), 'medium', (6-7) or 'high' (8-9). When available, comprehensiveness scores were compared with scores from a 2009 survey. We used patient-level data with site services to investigate the relationship between the comprehensiveness of services and retention. RESULTS: Survey data from 174 IeDEA sites in 32 countries were analysed. Of the WHO essential services, sites were most likely to offer antiretroviral therapy (ART) provision and counselling (n=173; 99%), co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (168; 97%), prevention of perinatal transmission services (167; 96%), outreach for patient engagement and follow-up (166; 95%), CD4 cell count testing (126; 88%), tuberculosis screening (151; 87%) and select immunisation services (126; 72%). Sites were less likely to offer nutrition/food support (97; 56%), viral load testing (99; 69%) and HIV counselling and testing (69; 40%). 10% of sites rated 'low', 59% 'medium' and 31% 'high' in the comprehensiveness score. The mean comprehensiveness of services score increased significantly from 5.6 in 2009 to 7.3 in 2014 (p<0.001; n=30). Patient-level analysis of lost to follow-up after ART initiation estimated the hazard was highest in sites rated 'low' and lowest in sites rated 'high'. CONCLUSION: This global assessment suggests the potential care impact of scaling-up and sustaining comprehensive paediatric HIV services. Meeting recommendations for comprehensive HIV services should remain a global priority.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Monitoring and switching of first-line antiretroviral therapy in adult treatment cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa: collaborative analysis.
    (2015-Jul) Haas AD; Keiser O; Balestre E; Brown S; Bissagnene E; Chimbetete C; Dabis F; Davies MA; Hoffmann CJ; Oyaro P; Parkes-Ratanshi R; Reynolds SJ; Sikazwe I; Wools-Kaloustian K; Zannou DM; Wandeler G; Egger M; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Newlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.; Kenya Medical Research Institute - RCTP FACES Program, Kisumu, Kenya.; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Rakai Health Sciences Program, Entebbe, Uganda; Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.; Faculté des Sciences de la Santé de l'Université d'Abomey-Calavi, and Centre de Traitement Ambulatoire du Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire Hubert Koutoukou Maga, Cotonou, Benin.; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: egger@ispm.unibe.ch.; Infectious Diseases Institute, Mulago Hospital Complex, Kampala, Uganda.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Treichville, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.; Centre de Recherche INSERM U897, Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Institut de Santé Publique, Epidémiologie et Développement, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    BACKGROUND: HIV-1 viral load testing is recommended to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART) but is not universally available. The aim of our study was to assess monitoring of first-line ART and switching to second-line ART in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We did a collaborative analysis of cohort studies from 16 countries in east Africa, southern Africa, and west Africa that participate in the international epidemiological database to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). We included adults infected with HIV-1 who started combination ART between January, 2004, and January, 2013. We defined switching of ART as a change from a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen to one including a protease inhibitor, with adjustment of one or more nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Virological and immunological failures were defined according to WHO criteria. We calculated cumulative probabilities of switching and hazard ratios with 95% CIs comparing routine viral load monitoring, targeted viral load monitoring, CD4 monitoring, and clinical monitoring, adjusting for programme and individual characteristics. FINDINGS: Of 297,825 eligible patients, 10,352 (3%) switched to second-line ART during 782 ,412 person-years of follow-up. Compared with CD4 monitoring, hazard ratios for switching were 3·15 (95% CI 2·92-3·40) for routine viral load monitoring, 1·21 (1·13-1·30) for targeted viral load monitoring, and 0·49 (0·43-0·56) for clinical monitoring. Of 6450 patients with confirmed virological failure, 58·0% (95% CI 56·5-59·6) switched by 2 years, and of 15,892 patients with confirmed immunological failure, 19·3% (18·5-20·0) switched by 2 years. Of 10,352 patients who switched, evidence of treatment failure based on one CD4 count or viral load measurement ranged from 86 (32%) of 268 patients with clinical monitoring to 3754 (84%) of 4452 with targeted viral load monitoring. Median CD4 counts at switching were 215 cells per μL (IQR 117-335) with routine viral load monitoring, but were lower with other types of monitoring (range 114-133 cells per μL). INTERPRETATION: Overall, few patients switched to second-line ART and switching happened late in the absence of routine viral load monitoring. Switching was more common and happened earlier after initiation of ART with targeted or routine viral load testing. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Swiss National Science Foundation.