Browsing by Author "Bwire G"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Contrasting Epidemiology of Cholera in Bangladesh and Africa.
    (2021-Dec-20) Sack DA; Debes AK; Ateudjieu J; Bwire G; Ali M; Ngwa MC; Mwaba J; Chilengi R; Orach CC; Boru W; Mohamed AA; Ram M; George CM; Stine OC; Ministry of Health and Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya.; Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Integrated Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Public Health Emergencies, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Meilleur Acces aux Soins de Sante, and Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, and Clinical Research Unit, Division of Health Operations Research, Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    In Bangladesh and West Bengal cholera is seasonal, transmission occurs consistently annually. By contrast, in most African countries, cholera has inconsistent seasonal patterns and long periods without obvious transmission. Transmission patterns in Africa occur during intermittent outbreaks followed by elimination of that genetic lineage. Later another outbreak may occur because of reintroduction of new or evolved lineages from adjacent areas, often by human travelers. These then subsequently undergo subsequent elimination. The frequent elimination and reintroduction has several implications when planning for cholera's elimination including: a) reconsidering concepts of definition of elimination, b) stress on rapid detection and response to outbreaks, c) more effective use of oral cholera vaccine and WASH, d) need to readjust estimates of disease burden for Africa, e) re-examination of water as a reservoir for maintaining endemicity in Africa. This paper reviews major features of cholera's epidemiology in African countries which appear different from the Ganges Delta.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Estimating the proportion of clinically suspected cholera cases that are true Vibrio cholerae infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    (2023-Sep) Wiens KE; Xu H; Zou K; Mwaba J; Lessler J; Malembaka EB; Demby MN; Bwire G; Qadri F; Lee EC; Azman AS; Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.; Geneva Centre for Emerging Viral Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.; Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.; Center for Tropical Diseases and Global Health (CTDGH), Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.; Division of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
    BACKGROUND: Cholera surveillance relies on clinical diagnosis of acute watery diarrhea. Suspected cholera case definitions have high sensitivity but low specificity, challenging our ability to characterize cholera burden and epidemiology. Our objective was to estimate the proportion of clinically suspected cholera that are true Vibrio cholerae infections and identify factors that explain variation in positivity. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that tested ≥10 suspected cholera cases for V. cholerae O1/O139 using culture, PCR, and/or a rapid diagnostic test. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies that sampled at least one suspected case between January 1, 2000 and April 19, 2023, to reflect contemporary patterns in V. cholerae positivity. We estimated diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity using a latent class meta-analysis. We estimated V. cholerae positivity using a random-effects meta-analysis, adjusting for test performance. We included 119 studies from 30 countries. V. cholerae positivity was lower in studies with representative sampling and in studies that set minimum ages in suspected case definitions. After adjusting for test performance, on average, 52% (95% credible interval (CrI): 24%, 80%) of suspected cases represented true V. cholerae infections. After adjusting for test performance and study methodology, the odds of a suspected case having a true infection were 5.71 (odds ratio 95% CrI: 1.53, 15.43) times higher when surveillance was initiated in response to an outbreak than in non-outbreak settings. Variation across studies was high, and a limitation of our approach was that we were unable to explain all the heterogeneity with study-level attributes, including diagnostic test used, setting, and case definitions. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that burden estimates based on suspected cases alone may overestimate the incidence of medically attended cholera by 2-fold. However, accounting for cases missed by traditional clinical surveillance is key to unbiased cholera burden estimates. Given the substantial variability in positivity between settings, extrapolations from suspected to confirmed cases, which is necessary to estimate cholera incidence rates without exhaustive testing, should be based on local data.