Browsing by Author "Chimoyi L"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia.(2022) Mukora R; Smith HJ; Herce ME; Chimoyi L; Hausler H; Fielding KL; Charalambous S; Hoffmann CJ; TB/HIV Care Association, Cape Town, South Africa.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; The Aurum Institute, Aurum House, The Ridge, Johannesburg, South Africa.; School of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.INTRODUCTION: Universal test and treat (UTT) is a population-based strategy that aims to ensure widespread HIV testing and rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all who have tested positive regardless of CD4 count to decrease HIV incidence and improve health outcomes. Little is known about the specific resources required to implement UTT in correctional facilities for incarcerated people. The primary aim of this study was to describe the resources used to implement UTT and to provide detailed costing to inform UTT scale-up in similar settings. METHODS: The costing study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in three correctional complexes, Johannesburg Correctional Facility in Johannesburg (>4000 inmates) South Africa, and Brandvlei (~3000 inmates), South Africa and Lusaka Central (~1400 inmates), Zambia. Costing was determined through a survey conducted between September and December 2017 that identified materials and labour used for three separate components of UTT: HIV testing services (HTS), ART initiation, and ART maintenance. Our study participants were staff working in the correctional facilities involved in any activity related to UTT implementation. Unit costs were reported as cost per client served while total costs were reported for all clients seen over a 12-month period. RESULTS: The cost of HIV testing services (HTS) per client was $ 92.12 at Brandvlei, $ 73.82 at Johannesburg, and $ 65.15 at Lusaka. The largest cost driver for HIV testing at Brandvlei were staff costs at 55.6% of the total cost, while at Johannesburg (56.5%) and Lusaka (86.6%) supplies were the largest contributor. The cost per client initiated on ART was $917 for Brandvlei, $421.8 for Johannesburg, and $252.1 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers were adherence counselling at Brandvlei (59%), and at Johannesburg and Lusaka it was the actual ART initiation at 75.6% and 75.8%, respectively. The annual unit cost for ART maintenance was $2,640.6 for Brandvlei, $710 for Johannesburg, and $385.5 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers for all three facilities were side effect monitoring, and initiation of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT), cotrimoxazole, and fluconazole, with this comprising 44.7% of the total cost at Brandvlei, 88.9% at Johannesburg, and 50.5% at Lusaka. CONCLUSION: Given the needs of this population, the opportunity to reach inmates at high risk for HIV, and overall national and global 95-95-95 goals, the UTT policies for incarcerated individuals are of vital importance. Our findings provide comparator costing data and highlight key drivers of UTT cost by facility.Item Delivery of TB preventive therapy to incarcerated people living with HIV in southern African correctional facilities.(2021-Dec-21) Chimoyi L; Smith H; Hausler H; Fielding K; Hoffmann CJ; Herce ME; Charalambous S; London School of Tropical Hygiene & Medicine, London, UK.; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; Institute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; TB HIV Care, Cape Town, South Africa.; The Aurum Institute, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)TB preventive treatment (TPT) is recommended for high-risk and hard-to-reach populations such as incarcerated people living with HIV (PLHIV). To assess implementation of TPT delivery in correctional settings, we conducted an exploratory analysis of data from a multisite cohort study in South Africa and Zambia. From 975 participants, 648 were screened for TB, and 409 initiated TPT mostly within a month after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (190/409, 46.5%). We observed a median gap of one month (IQR 0.6-4.7) in TPT delivery to incarcerated PLHIV. Future research should examine standardised quality improvement tools and new strategies such as short-course regimens to improve TPT initiation in this population.Item "It's Not Like Taking Chocolates": Factors Influencing the Feasibility and Sustainability of Universal Test and Treat in Correctional Health Systems in Zambia and South Africa.(2019-Jun) Topp SM; Chetty-Makkan CM; Smith HJ; Chimoyi L; Hoffmann CJ; Fielding K; Reid SE; Olivier AJ; Hausler H; Herce ME; Charalambous S; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.; TB/HIV Care Association, Cape Town, South Africa.; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia. globalstopp@gmail.com.; Institute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan African correctional facilities concentrate large numbers of people who are living with HIV or at risk for HIV infection. Universal test and treat (UTT) is widely recognized as a promising approach to improve the health of individuals and a population health strategy to reduce new HIV infections. In this study, we explored the feasibility and sustainability of implementing UTT in correctional facilities in Zambia and South Africa. METHODS: Nested within a UTT implementation research study, our qualitative evaluation of feasibility and sustainability used a case-comparison design based on data from 1 Zambian and 3 South African correctional facilities. Primary data from in-depth interviews with incarcerated individuals, correctional managers, health care providers, and policy makers were supplemented by public policy documents, study documentation, and implementation memos in both countries. Thematic analysis was informed by an empirically established conceptual framework for health system analysis. RESULTS: Despite different institutional profiles, we were able to successfully introduce UTT in the South Africa and Zambian correctional facilities participating in the study. A supportive policy backdrop was important to UTT implementation and establishment in both countries. However, sustainability of UTT, defined as relevant government departments' capacity to independently plan, resource, and administer quality UTT, differed. South Africa's correctional facilities had existing systems to deliver and monitor chronic HIV care and treatment, forming a "scaffolding" for sustained UTT despite some human resources shortages and poorly integrated health information systems. Notwithstanding recent improvements, Zambia's correctional health system demonstrated insufficient material and technical capacity to independently deliver quality UTT. In the correctional facilities of both countries, inmate population dynamics and their impact on HIV-related stigma were important factors in UTT service uptake. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate the critical role of policy directives, health service delivery systems, adequate resourcing, and population dynamics on the feasibility and likely sustainability of UTT in corrections in Zambia and South Africa.Item Reaching for 90:90:90 in Correctional Facilities in South Africa and Zambia: Virtual Cross-Section of Coverage of HIV Testing and Antiretroviral Therapy During Universal Test and Treat Implementation.(2024-Aug-15) Hoffmann CJ; Herce ME; Chimoyi L; Smith HJ; Tlali M; Olivier CJ; Topp SM; Muyoyeta M; Reid SE; Hausler H; Charalambous S; Fielding K; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.; College of Public Health Medicine and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.; Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; and.; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.; TB HIV Care, Cape Town, South Africa.; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.; School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.BACKGROUND: People in correctional settings are a key population for HIV epidemic control. We sought to demonstrate scale-up of universal test and treat in correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia through a virtual cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: We used routine data on 2 dates: At the start of universal test and treat implementation (time 1, T1) and 1 year later (time 2, T2). We obtained correctional facility census lists for the selected dates and matched HIV testing and treatment data to generate virtual cross-sections of HIV care continuum indicators. RESULTS: In the South African site, there were 4193 and 3868 people in the facility at times T1 and T2; 43% and 36% were matched with HIV testing or treatment data, respectively. At T1 and T2, respectively, 1803 (43%) and 1386 (36%) had known HIV status, 804 (19%) and 845 (21%) were known to be living with HIV, and 60% and 56% of those with known HIV were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). In the Zambian site, there were 1467 and 1366 people in the facility at times T1 and T2; 58% and 92% were matched with HIV testing or treatment data, respectively. At T1 and T2, respectively, 857 (59%) and 1263 (92%) had known HIV status, 277 (19%) and 647 (47%) were known to be living with HIV, and 68% and 68% of those with known HIV were receiving ART. CONCLUSIONS: This virtual cross-sectional analysis identified gaps in HIV testing coverage, and ART initiation that was not clearly demonstrated by prior cohort-based studies.Item Universal test-and-treat in Zambian and South African correctional facilities: a multisite prospective cohort study.(2020-Dec) Herce ME; Hoffmann CJ; Fielding K; Topp SM; Hausler H; Chimoyi L; Smith HJ; Chetty-Makkan CM; Mukora R; Tlali M; Olivier AJ; Muyoyeta M; Reid SE; Charalambous S; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.; College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia.; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.; TB HIV Care, Cape Town, South Africa.; The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: michael.herce@cidrz.org.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.BACKGROUND: Despite the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), incarcerated people have not benefited equally from test-and-treat recommendations for HIV. To improve access to ART for incarcerated people with HIV, we introduced a universal test-and-treat (UTT) intervention in correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia, and aimed to assess UTT feasibility and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Treatment as Prevention (TasP) was a multisite, mixed methods, implementation research study done at three correctional complexes in South Africa (Johnannesburg and Breede River) and Zambia (Lusaka). Here, we report the clinical outcomes for a prospective cohort of incarcerated individuals who were offered the TasP UTT intervention. Incarcerated individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, with new or previously diagnosed HIV, not yet on ART, and were expected to remain incarcerated for 30 days or longer. To enable the implementation of UTT at the included correctional facilities, we first strengthened on-site HIV service delivery. All participants were offered same-day ART initiation, and had two study-specific follow-up visits scheduled to coincide with routine clinic visits at 6 and 12 months. The main outcomes were ART uptake, time from cohort enrolment to ART initiation, and retention in care and viral suppression at 6 and 12 months. We estimated the association between baseline demographic characteristics and time to ART initiation using Cox proportional hazard models, and, in a post-hoc analysis, we used logistic regression models to assess the association between demographic and clinical variables, including time to ART initiation, and the proportion of participants with a composite poor outcome (defined as viral load >50 copies per mL, or for participants with a missing viral load, lack of retention in care in the on-site ART programme) at 6 months. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02946762. FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2016, and Dec 31, 2017, we identified 1562 incarcerated people with HIV, of whom 1389 (89%) were screened, 1021 (74%) met eligibility criteria, and 975 (95%) were enrolled and followed up to March 31, 2018. At the end of follow-up, 835 (86%) of 975 participants had started ART. Median time from enrolment to ART initiation was 0 days (IQR 0-8). Of 346 participants who remained incarcerated at 6 months, 327 (95%) were retained in care and 269 (78%) had a documented viral load, of whom 262 (97%) achieved viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL). The mortality rate among the 835 participants who had initiated ART was 1·9 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0·9-3·9). No statistically significant associations were identified between any baseline characteristics and time to ART initiation or composite poor outcome. INTERPRETATION: UTT implementation is feasible in correctional settings, and can achieve levels of same-day ART uptake, retention in care, and viral suppression among incarcerated people with HIV that are comparable to those observed in community settings. FUNDING: UK Department for International Development, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.