Browsing by Author "Chipeta C"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of ROTARIX
    (2023-Feb-03) Laban NM; Bosomprah S; Simuyandi M; Chibuye M; Chauwa A; Chirwa-Chobe M; Sukwa N; Chipeta C; Velu R; Njekwa K; Mubanga C; Mwape I; Goodier MR; Chilengi R; Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.; Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Paasheuvelweg 25, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Stellenbosch University & National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, P.O. Box 241, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG13, Ghana.; Flow Cytometry and Immunology Facility, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Banjul P.O. Box 273, The Gambia.; Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka P.O. Box 50110, Zambia.; Enteric Disease and Vaccine Research Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka P.O. Box 34681, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    Oral rotavirus vaccines show diminished immunogenicity in low-resource settings where rotavirus burden is highest. This study assessed the safety and immune boosting effect of a third dose of oral ROTARIX
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Immunogenicity and safety of two monovalent rotavirus vaccines, ROTAVAC® and ROTAVAC 5D® in Zambian infants.
    (2021-Jun-16) Chilengi R; Mwila-Kazimbaya K; Chirwa M; Sukwa N; Chipeta C; Velu RM; Katanekwa N; Babji S; Kang G; McNeal MM; Meyer N; Gompana G; Hazra S; Tang Y; Flores J; Bhat N; Rathi N; PATH, India. Electronic address: nrathi@path.org.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Zambia.; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.; The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Vellore, India.; PATH, India.; PATH, USA.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ROTAVAC® (frozen formulation stored at -20 °C) and ROTAVAC 5D® (liquid formulation stable at 2-8 °C) are rotavirus vaccines derived from the 116E human neonatal rotavirus strain, developed and licensed in India. This study evaluated and compared the safety and immunogenicity of these vaccines in an infant population in Zambia. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2b, open-label, randomized, controlled trial wherein 450 infants 6 to 8 weeks of age were randomized equally to receive three doses of ROTAVAC or ROTAVAC 5D, or two doses of ROTARIX®. Study vaccines were administered concomitantly with routine immunizations. Blood samples were collected pre-vaccination and 28 days after the last dose. Serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibodies were measured by ELISA, with WC3 and 89-12 rotavirus strains as viral lysates in the assays. The primary analysis was to assess non-inferiority of ROTAVAC 5D to ROTAVAC in terms of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of serum IgA (WC3) antibodies. Seroresponse and seropositivity were also determined. Safety was evaluated as occurrence of immediate, solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events after each dose. RESULTS: The study evaluated 388 infants in the per-protocol population. All three vaccines were well tolerated and immunogenic. The post-vaccination GMCs were 14.0 U/mL (95% CI: 10.4, 18.8) and 18.1 U/mL (95% CI: 13.7, 24.0) for the ROTAVAC and ROTAVAC 5D groups, respectively, yielding a ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.9, 1.9), thus meeting the pre-set non-inferiority criteria. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were similar across all study arms. No death or intussusception case was reported during study period. CONCLUSIONS: Among Zambian infants, both ROTAVAC and ROTAVAC 5D were well tolerated and the immunogenicity of ROTAVAC 5D was non-inferior to that of ROTAVAC. These results are consistent with those observed in licensure trials in India and support use of these vaccines across wider geographical areas.