Browsing by Author "Halwindi H"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Lost in translation: key lessons from conducting dissemination and implementation science in Zambia.
    (2024-Oct-29) Maritim P; Munakampe MN; Nglazi M; Mweemba C; Sikombe K; Mbewe W; Silumbwe A; Jacobs C; Zulu JM; Herce M; Mutale W; Halwindi H
    BACKGROUND: As the field of implementation science continues to grow, its key concepts are being transferred into new contexts globally, such as Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), and its use is constantly being reexamined and expanded. Theoretical and methodological positions commonly used in implementation research and practice have great utility in our work but in many cases are at odds with LMIC contexts. As a team of implementation scientists based in Zambia, we offer this commentary as a critical self-reflection on what has worked and what could limit us from fully utilizing the field's promise for addressing health problems with contextual understanding. MAIN BODY: We used a 'premortem,' an approach used to generate potential alternatives from failed assumptions about a particular phenomenon, as a way to reflect on our experiences conducting implementation research and practice. By utilizing prospectively imagined hindsights, we were able to reflect on the past, present and possible future of the field in Zambia. Six key challenges identified were: (i) epistemic injustices; (ii) simplified conceptualizations of evidence-informed interventions; (iii) limited theorization of the complexity of low-resource contexts and it impacts on implementation; (iv) persistent lags in transforming research into practice; (v) limited focus on strategic dissemination of implementation science knowledge and (vi) existing training and capacity building initiatives' failure to engage a broad range of actors including practitioners through diverse learning models. CONCLUSION: Implementation science offers great promise in addressing many health problems in Zambia. Through this commentary, we hope to spur discussions on how implementation scientists can reimagine the future of the field by contemplating on lessons from our experiences in LMIC settings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Tobacco smoking and smokeless tobacco use among people living with HIV in Zambia: Findings from a 2023 National NCD/HIV Survey.
    (2025) Zyambo C; Somwe P; Mandyata C; Musukuma M; Bwembya P; Phiri H; Chavula MP; Halwindi H; Zulu J; Mutale W
    BACKGROUND: People living with HIV (PLWH) who use tobacco face significant public health risks compared to non-users, including an average loss of 12.3 years of life expectancy. Tobacco use increases the likelihood of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and non-AIDS-related cancers. AIM: This study investigated factors associated with tobacco smoking and smokeless tobacco (SLT) use among PLWH in Zambia. METHODS: Data were obtained from a national cross-sectional survey involving 5,204 PLWH from 193 clinics across Zambia's 10 provinces. Tobacco smoking, SLT use, behavioral patterns, and clinical characteristics were assessed. Logistic regression was used to determine unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Among the 5,204 PLWH surveyed, 9.7% were current tobacco smokers (21.9% men, 3.7% women), while 1.4% used smokeless tobacco (1.81% men, 1.26% women). In the multivariable analysis, several factors were identified as predictors of tobacco smoking. Male individuals had significantly higher odds of smoking (AOR: 4.81, 95% CI: 3.36-6.90). In contrast, higher educational attainment was associated with lower odds of smoking (AOR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16-0.52). Alcohol consumption was associated with an increased likelihood of smoking (AOR: 4.97, 95% CI: 2.93-8.44). Additionally, overweight or obese individuals were less likely to smoke, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35-0.85) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.79), respectively. Non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) was also associated with higher smoking rates (AOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.14-2.67). Similarly, several factors were identified as predictors of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use. Individuals with an annual income exceeding 4,000 ZMW had lower odds of using SLT (AOR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14-0.73). In contrast, alcohol users exhibited significantly higher odds of SLT use (AOR: 14.74, 95% CI: 1.99-109.02). Furthermore, non-adherence to ART was associated with an increased likelihood of SLT use (AOR: 3.32, 95% CI: 1.54-7.17). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions to reduce tobacco use among PLWH in Zambia. Integrating these measures within the existing healthcare framework can maximize impact. Gender-specific programs addressing unique risk factors, alongside economic empowerment initiatives for low-income females, could help curb SLT use. Additionally, reinforcing ART adherence through tobacco cessation counseling within HIV care settings may lower smoking rates. Given the strong association between alcohol consumption and tobacco use, structured behavioral interventions and support programs should also be prioritized. Strengthening collaborations between health authorities and community organizations can further enhance accessibility and outreach. By embedding these strategies within primary care and ART clinics, Zambia can effectively reduce tobacco use among PLWH, ultimately improving overall health outcomes and strengthening HIV management efforts.