Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of CIDRZ Publications
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Hillier SL"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Corrigendum to "oral and injectable contraceptive use and HIV acquisition risk among women in four African countries: a secondary analysis of data from a microbicide trial" [Contraception 2016; 93 (1): 25-31].
    (2016-Jul) Balkus JE; Brown ER; Hillier SL; Coletti A; Ramjee G; Mgodi N; Makanani B; Reid C; Martinson F; Soto-Torres L; Abdool Karim SS; Chirenje ZM; College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; FHI360, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and the Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.; University of North Carolina Project, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella, South Africa; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.; University of Zimbabwe - University of California San Francisco Research Program, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; HIV Prevention Research Unit, South Africa Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jbalkus@fhcrc.org.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    HPTN 035 phase II/IIb randomised safety and effectiveness study of the vaginal microbicides BufferGel and 0.5% PRO 2000 for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in women.
    (2014-Aug) Guffey MB; Richardson B; Husnik M; Makanani B; Chilongozi D; Yu E; Ramjee G; Mgodi N; Gomez K; Hillier SL; Karim SA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.; University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pensylvania, USA.; University of KwaZulu-Natal, CAPRISA, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco Collaborative Research Programme, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe.; FHI 360, Science Facilitation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.; Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effectiveness of candidate microbicides BufferGel and 0.5% PRO 2000 Gel (P) (PRO 2000) for prevention of non-ulcerative sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, 3099 women were enrolled in HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) protocol 035, a phase II/IIb evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and PRO 2000 for prevention of STIs, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Incidences of STIs were determined by study arm, and HRs of BufferGel and PRO 2000 versus placebo gel or no gel control groups were computed using discrete time Andersen-Gill proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The overall incidence rates were 1.6/100 person-years at risk (PYAR) for NG, 3.9/100 PYAR for CT and 15.3/100 PYAR for TV. For BufferGel versus placebo gel, HRs were 0.99 (95% CI 0.49 to 2.00), 1.00 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.57) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.25) for prevention of NG, CT and TV, respectively. For PRO 2000, HRs were 1.66 (95% CI 0.90 to 3.06), 1.16 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.79) and 1.18 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.53) for prevention of NG, CT and TV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of STIs was high during HIV Prevention Trials Network 035 despite provision of free condoms and comprehensive risk-reduction counselling, highlighting the need for effective STI prevention programmes in this population. Unfortunately, candidate microbicides BufferGel and PRO2000 had no protective effect against gonorrhoea, chlamydia or trichomoniasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00074425.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Oral and injectable contraceptive use and HIV acquisition risk among women in four African countries: a secondary analysis of data from a microbicide trial.
    (2016-Jan) Balkus JE; Brown ER; Hillier SL; Coletti A; Ramjee G; Mgodi N; Makanani B; Reid C; Martinson F; Soto-Torres L; Abdool Karim SS; Chirenje ZM; College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; FHI360, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and the Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.; University of North Carolina Project, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.; Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella, South Africa; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.; University of Zimbabwe - University of California San Francisco Research Program, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; HIV Prevention Research Unit, South Africa Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jbalkus@fhcrc.org.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of oral and injectable contraceptive use compared to nonhormonal contraceptive use on HIV acquisition among Southern African women enrolled in a microbicide trial. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study using data from women enrolled in HIV Prevention Trials Network protocol 035. At each quarterly visit, participants were interviewed about self-reported contraceptive use and sexual behaviors and underwent HIV testing. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the effect of injectable and oral hormonal contraceptive use on HIV acquisition. RESULTS: The analysis included 2830 participants, of whom 106 became HIV infected (4.07 per 100 person-years). At baseline, 1546 (51%) participants reported using injectable contraceptives and 595 (21%) reported using oral contraceptives. HIV incidence among injectable, oral and nonhormonal contraceptive method users was 4.72, 2.68 and 3.83 per 100 person-years, respectively. Injectable contraceptive use was associated with a nonstatistically significant increased risk of HIV acquisition [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70, 1.96], while oral contraceptive use was associated with a nonstatistically significant decreased risk of HIV acquisition (aHR=0.76; 95% CI 0.37,1.55). CONCLUSION: In this secondary analysis of randomized trial data, a marginal, but nonstatistically significant, increase in HIV risk among women using injectable hormonal contraceptives was observed. No increased HIV risk was observed among women using oral contraceptives. Our findings support the World Health Organization's recommendation that women at high risk for acquiring HIV, including those using progestogen-only injectable contraception, should be strongly advised to always use condoms and other HIV prevention measures. IMPLICATIONS: Among Southern African women participating in an HIV prevention trial, women using injectable hormonal contraceptives had a modest increased risk of HIV acquisition; however, this association was not statistically significant. Continued research on the relationship between widely used hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition is essential.

CIDRZ copyright © 2025

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback