Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of CIDRZ Publications
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Lumpa M"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of real-time electronic data entry on HIV programme data quality in Lusaka, Zambia.
    (2020-Mar-21) Moomba K; Williams A; Savory T; Lumpa M; Chilembo P; Tweya H; Harries AD; Herce M
    SETTING: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics in five hospitals and five health centres in Lusaka, Zambia, which transitioned from daily entry of paper-based data records to an electronic medical record (EMR) system by dedicated data staff (Electronic-Last) to direct real-time data entry into the EMR by frontline health workers (Electronic-First). OBJECTIVE: To compare completeness and accuracy of key HIV-related variables before and after transition of data entry from Electronic-Last to Electronic-First. DESIGN: Comparative cross-sectional study using existing secondary data. RESULTS: Registration data (e.g., date of birth) was 100% complete and pharmacy data (e.g., antiretroviral therapy regimen) was <90% complete under both approaches. Completeness of anthropometric and vital sign data was <75% across all facilities under Electronic-Last, and this worsened after Electronic-First. Completeness of TB screening and World Health Organization clinical staging data was also <75%, but improved with Electronic-First. Data entry errors for registration and clinical consultations decreased under Electronic-First, but errors increased for all anthropometric and vital sign variables. Patterns were similar in hospitals and health centres. CONCLUSION: With the notable exception of clinical consultation data, data completeness and accuracy did not improve after transitioning from Electronic-Last to Electronic-First. For anthropometric and vital sign variables, completeness and accuracy decreased. Quality improvement interventions are needed to improve Electronic-First implementation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating InferVision's Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) algorithm for Tuberculosis (TB) screening, Lusaka, Zambia.
    (2025) Somwe P; Maimbolwa M; Chiyenu K; Lumpa M; Kagujje M; Muyoyeta M
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of InferRead DR Chest for tuberculosis (TB) screening in a high HIV and TB burden setting. The study assessed the performance of InferRead DR Chest using anonymized chest X-ray images from an active TB case finding study in Lusaka, Zambia, for individuals aged 15 and older. The Xpert MTB/RIF or MTB culture was the composite reference standard. Performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), and a binary classification point was selected where the sensitivity aligned with the WHO target product profile for TB screening tools. Of the 1,890 chest X-ray images that met the inclusion criteria, 91.5% of participants reported at least one TB symptom. The median age was 38 years (IQR: 29-47), and 1,186 (62.8%) were male. From the study sample, 449 participants (23.8%) reported a history of previous TB, and 704 (37.2%) were HIV positive. Among the analyzed images, 289 (15.3%) were classified as TB positive based on the composite reference standard test results. The overall area under the curve (AUC) was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.83). Among individuals with a history of previous TB and those who were HIV positive, the AUCs were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82), respectively. At a sensitivity of 90.3% (95% CI: 86.3%-93.5%), InferRead DR Chest achieved a specificity of 39.2% (95% CI: 36.8%-41.7%) at TB score cut point of 0.12. InferRead DR Chest had acceptable performance in our population. Additional training and piloting of InferRead DR Chest in this population is recommended.

CIDRZ copyright © 2026

  • Send Feedback