Browsing by Author "Mbewe P"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
(2022-Nov-16) Malhotra A; Thompson RR; Kagoya F; Masiye F; Mbewe P; Mosepele M; Phiri J; Sambo J; Barker A; Cameron DB; Davila-Roman VG; Effah W; Hutchinson B; Laxy M; Newsome B; Watkins D; Sohn H; Dowdy DW; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.; Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.; Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.; Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Seattle, WA, USA.; University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.; Fogarty International Center (FIC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. ddowdy1@jhmi.edu.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Cavendish University Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.; University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Historically, the focus of cost-effectiveness analyses has been on the costs to operate and deliver interventions after their initial design and launch. The costs related to design and implementation of interventions have often been omitted. Ignoring these costs leads to an underestimation of the true price of interventions and biases economic analyses toward favoring new interventions. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where implementation may require substantial up-front investment. This scoping review was conducted to explore the topics, depth, and availability of scientific literature on integrating implementation science into economic evaluations of health interventions in LMICs. METHODS: We searched Web of Science and PubMed for papers published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, that included components of both implementation science and economic evaluation. Studies from LMICs were prioritized for review, but papers from high-income countries were included if their methodology/findings were relevant to LMIC settings. RESULTS: Six thousand nine hundred eighty-six studies were screened, of which 55 were included in full-text review and 23 selected for inclusion and data extraction. Most papers were theoretical, though some focused on a single disease or disease subset, including: mental health (n = 5), HIV (n = 3), tuberculosis (n = 3), and diabetes (n = 2). Manuscripts included a mix of methodology papers, empirical studies, and other (e.g., narrative) reviews. Authorship of the included literature was skewed toward high-income settings, with 22 of the 23 papers featuring first and senior authors from high-income countries. Of nine empirical studies included, no consistent implementation cost outcomes were measured, and only four could be mapped to an existing costing or implementation framework. There was also substantial heterogeneity across studies in how implementation costs were defined, and the methods used to collect them. CONCLUSION: A sparse but growing literature explores the intersection of implementation science and economic evaluation. Key needs include more research in LMICs, greater consensus on the definition of implementation costs, standardized methods to collect such costs, and identifying outcomes of greatest relevance. Addressing these gaps will result in stronger links between implementation science and economic evaluation and will create more robust and accurate estimates of intervention costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this manuscript was published on the Open Science Framework. It is available at: https://osf.io/ms5fa/ (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/32EPJ).
Evaluating a multifaceted implementation strategy and package of evidence-based interventions based on WHO PEN for people living with HIV and cardiometabolic conditions in Lusaka, Zambia: protocol for the TASKPEN hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.
(2024-Jun-06) Herce ME; Bosomprah S; Masiye F; Mweemba O; Edwards JK; Mandyata C; Siame M; Mwila C; Matenga T; Frimpong C; Mugala A; Mbewe P; Shankalala P; Sichone P; Kasenge B; Chunga L; Adams R; Banda B; Mwamba D; Nachalwe N; Agarwal M; Williams MJ; Tonwe V; Pry JM; Musheke M; Vinikoor M; Mutale W; Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.; Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.; Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. michael.herce@cidrz.org.; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia. michael.herce@cidrz.org.; Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing morbidity and mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCD) globally, health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have limited capacity to address these chronic conditions, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). There is an urgent need, therefore, to respond to NCDs in SSA, beginning by applying lessons learned from the first global response to any chronic disease-HIV-to tackle the leading cardiometabolic killers of people living with HIV (PLHIV). We have developed a feasible and acceptable package of evidence-based interventions and a multi-faceted implementation strategy, known as "TASKPEN," that has been adapted to the Zambian setting to address hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The TASKPEN multifaceted implementation strategy focuses on reorganizing service delivery for integrated HIV-NCD care and features task-shifting, practice facilitation, and leveraging HIV platforms for NCD care. We propose a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effects of TASKPEN on clinical and implementation outcomes, including dual control of HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs, as well as quality of life, intervention reach, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: The trial will be conducted in 12 urban health facilities in Lusaka, Zambia over a 30-month period. Clinical outcomes will be assessed via surveys with PLHIV accessing routine HIV services, and a prospective cohort of PLHIV with cardiometabolic comorbidities nested within the larger trial. We will also collect data using mixed methods, including in-depth interviews, questionnaires, focus group discussions, and structured observations, and estimate cost-effectiveness through time-and-motion studies and other costing methods, to understand implementation outcomes according to Proctor's Outcomes for Implementation Research, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and selected dimensions of RE-AIM. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will be used to make discrete, actionable, and context-specific recommendations in Zambia and the region for integrating cardiometabolic NCD care into national HIV treatment programs. While the TASKPEN study focuses on cardiometabolic NCDs in PLHIV, the multifaceted implementation strategy studied will be relevant to other NCDs and to people without HIV. It is expected that the trial will generate new insights that enable delivery of high-quality integrated HIV-NCD care, which may improve cardiovascular morbidity and viral suppression for PLHIV in SSA. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05950919).