Browsing by Author "Mody A"

Now showing 1 - 20 of 25

Comparison of patient exit interviews with unannounced standardised patients for assessing HIV service delivery in Zambia: a study nested within a cluster randomised trial.
(2023-Jul-05) Sikombe K; Pry JM; Mody A; Rice B; Bukankala C; Eshun-Wilson I; Mutale J; Simbeza S; Beres LK; Mukamba N; Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya M; Mwamba D; Sharma A; Wringe A; Hargreaves J; Bolton-Moore C; Holmes C; Sikazwe IT; Geng E; Center for Innovation in Global Health, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.; Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia kombatende.sikombe@cidrz.org.; Implementation Science Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Social and Behavioural Science Research Group, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.; Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
OBJECTIVES: To compare unannounced standardised patient approach (eg, mystery clients) with typical exit interviews for assessing patient experiences in HIV care (eg, unfriendly providers, long waiting times). We hypothesise standardised patients would report more negative experiences than typical exit interviews affected by social desirability bias. SETTING: Cross-sectional surveys in 16 government-operated HIV primary care clinics in Lusaka, Zambia providing antiretroviral therapy (ART). PARTICIPANTS: 3526 participants aged ≥18 years receiving ART participated in the exit surveys between August 2019 and November 2021. INTERVENTION: Systematic sample (every n OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared patient experience among patients who received brief training prior to their care visit (explaining each patient experience construct in the exit survey, being anonymous, without manipulating behaviour) with those who did not undergo training on the survey prior to their visit. RESULTS: Among 3526 participants who participated in exit surveys, 2415 were untrained (56% female, median age 40 (IQR: 32-47)) and 1111 were trained (50% female, median age 37 (IQR: 31-45)). Compared with untrained, trained patients were more likely to report a negative care experience overall (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) for aggregate sum score: 1.64 (95% CI: 1.39 to 1.94)), with a greater proportion reporting feeling unwelcome by providers (aPR: 1.71 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.44)) and witnessing providers behaving rude (aPR: 2.28 (95% CI: 1.63 to 3.19)). CONCLUSION: Trained patients were more likely to identify suboptimal care. They may have understood the items solicited better or felt empowered to be more critical. We trained existing patients, unlike studies that use 'standardised patients' drawn from outside the patient population. This low-cost strategy could improve patient-centred service delivery elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Assessment was nested within a parent study; www.pactr.org registered the parent study (PACTR202101847907585).
Cross-sectional study to assess depression among healthcare workers in Lusaka, Zambia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(2023-Apr-05) Simbeza S; Mutale J; Mulabe M; Jere L; Bukankala C; Sikombe K; Sikazwe I; Bolton-Moore C; Mody A; Geng EH; Sharma A; Beres LK; Pry JM; Research Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Research Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Research Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia jmpry@ucdavis.edu.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess depression among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the context of COVID-19 in Lusaka Province, Zambia. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study is nested within a larger study, the Person-Centred Public Health for HIV Treatment in Zambia (PCPH), a cluster-randomised trial to assess HIV care and outcomes. SETTING: The research was conducted in 24 government-run health facilities from 11 August to 15 October 2020 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Lusaka, Zambia. PARTICIPANTS: We used convenience sampling to recruit HCW participants who were previously enrolled in the PCPH study, had more than 6 months' experience working at the facility and were voluntarily willing to participate. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We implemented the well-validated 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess HCW depression. We used mixed-effects, adjusted Poisson regression to estimate the marginal probability of HCWs experiencing depression that may warrant intervention (PHQ-9 score ≥5) by healthcare facility. RESULTS: We collected PHQ-9 survey responses from 713 professional and lay HCWs. Overall, 334 (46.8%, 95% CI 43.1%, 50.6%) HCWs recorded a PHQ-9 score ≥5, indicating the need for further assessment and potential intervention for depression. We identified significant heterogeneity across facilities and observed a greater proportion of HCWs with symptoms of depression in facilities providing COVID-19 testing and treatment services. CONCLUSIONS: Depression may be a concern for a large proportion of HCWs in Zambia. Further work to understand the magnitude and aetiologies of depression among HCWs in the public sector is needed to design effective prevention and treatment interventions to meet the needs for mental health support and to minimise poor health outcomes.
Effect of a multicomponent, person-centred care intervention on client experience and HIV treatment outcomes in Zambia: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
(2025-Jan) Sikombe K; Mody A; Goss CW; Simbeza S; Beres LK; Pry JM; Eshun-Wilson I; Sharma A; Mukamba N; Mulenga LB; Rice B; Mutale J; Zulu Dube A; Mulabe M; Hargreaves J; Bolton Moore C; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Geng EH; Johnson & Johnson, Cape Town, South Africa.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.; Zambian Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.; Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: kombatende.sikombe@cidrz.org.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Implementation Science Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Recipients of health services value not only convenience but also respectful, kind, and helpful providers. To date, research to improve person-centred HIV treatment has focused on making services easier to access (eg, differentiated service delivery) rather than the interpersonal experience of care. We developed and evaluated a person-centred care (PCC) intervention targeting practices of health-care workers. METHODS: Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised design, we randomly allocated 24 HIV clinics stratified by size in Zambia into four groups and introduced a PCC intervention that targeted caring aspects of the behaviour of health-care workers in one group every 6 months. The intervention entailed training and coaching for health-care workers on PCC practices (to capacitate), client experience assessment with feedback to facilities (to create opportunities), and small performance-based incentives (to motivate). In a probability sample of clients who were pre-trained on a client experience exit survey and masked to facility intervention status, we evaluated effects on client experience by use of mean score change and also proportion with poor encounters (ie, score of ≤8 on a 12-point survey instrument). We examined effects on missed visits (ie, >30 days late for next scheduled encounter) in all groups and retention in care at 15 months in group 1 and group 4 by use of electronic health records. We assessed effects on treatment success at 15 months (ie, HIV RNA concentration <400 copies per mL or adjudicated care status) in a prospectively enrolled subset of clients from group 1 and group 4. We estimated treatment effects with mixed-effects logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, and baseline care status. This trial is registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (202101847907585), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 12, 2019, and Nov 30, 2021, 177 543 unique clients living with HIV made at least one visit to one of the 24 study clinics. The PCC intervention reduced the proportion of poor visits based on exit surveys from 147 (23·3%) of 632 during control periods to 33 (13·3%) of 249 during the first 6 months of intervention, and then to eight (3·5%) of 230 at 6 months or later (adjusted risk difference [aRD] for control vs ≥6 months intervention -16·9 percentage points, 95% CI -24·8 to -8·9). Among all adult scheduled appointments, the PCC intervention reduced the proportion of missed visits from 90 593 (25·3%) of 358 741 during control periods to 40 380 (22·6%) of 178 523 in the first 6 months, and then 52 288 (21·5%) of 243 350 at 6 months or later (aRD for control vs the intervention -4·2 percentage points, 95% CI -4·8 to -3·7). 15-month retention improved from 33 668 (80·2%) of 41 998 in control to 35 959 (83·6%) of 43 005 during intervention (aRD 5·9 percentage points, 95% CI 0·6 to 11·2), with larger effects in clients newly starting treatment (aRD 12·7 percentage points, 1·4 to 23·9). We found no effect on treatment success (based on viral load) in a nested subcohort (379 [83·7%] of 453 in the control phase vs 402 [83·8%] of 480 in the intervention phase; aRD 0·9 percentage points, -5·4 to 7·2). INTERPRETATION: Improving the caring aspects of health-care worker behaviour is feasible in public health settings, enhances client experience, reduces missed appointments, and increases retention. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Effects of implementing universal and rapid HIV treatment on initiation of antiretroviral therapy and retention in care in Zambia: a natural experiment using regression discontinuity.
(2021-Dec) Mody A; Sikazwe I; Namwase AS; Wa Mwanza M; Savory T; Mwila A; Mulenga L; Herce ME; Mweebo K; Somwe P; Eshun-Wilson I; Sikombe K; Beres LK; Pry J; Holmes CB; Bolton-Moore C; Geng EH; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.; Zambian Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.; Center for Disease Control, Lusaka, Zambia.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: aaloke.mody@wustl.edu.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Universal testing and treatment (UTT) for all people living with HIV has only been assessed under experimental conditions in cluster-randomised trials. The public health effectiveness of UTT policies on the HIV care cascade under real-world conditions is not known. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of universal HIV treatment policies that were implemented in Zambia on Jan 1, 2017. METHODS: We used data from Zambia's routine electronic health record system to analyse antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults who newly enrolled in HIV care up to 1 year before and after the implementation of universal treatment (ie, Jan 1, 2016, to Jan 1, 2018) at 117 clinics supported by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia. We used a regression discontinuity design to estimate the effects of implementing UTT on same-day ART initiation, ART initiation within 1 month, and retention on ART at 12 months (defined as clinic attendance 9-15 months after enrolment and at least 6 months on ART), under the assumption that patients presenting immediately before and after UTT implementation were balanced on both measured and unmeasured characteristics. We did an instrumental variable analysis to estimate the effect of same-day ART initiation under routine conditions on 12-month retention on ART. FINDINGS: 65 673 newly enrolled patients with HIV (40 858 [62·2%] female, median age 32 years [IQR 26-39], median CD4 count 287 cells per μL [IQR 147-466]) were eligible for inclusion in the analyses; 31 145 enrolled before implementation of UTT, and 34 528 enrolled after UTT. Implementation of universal treatment increased same-day ART initiation from 41·7% to 74·8% (risk difference [RD] 33·1%, 95% CI 30·5-35·7), ART initiation by 1 month from 69·6% to 87·0% (RD 17·4%, 15·5-19·3), and 12-month retention on ART from 56·2% to 63·3% (RD 7·1%, 4·3-9·9). ART initiation rates became more uniform across patient subgroups after implementation of universal treatment, but heterogeneity in 12-month retention on ART between subgroups was unchanged. Instrumental variable analyses indicated that same-day ART initiation in routine settings led to a 15·8% increase (95% CI 12·1-19·5) in 12-month retention on ART. INTERPRETATION: UTT policies implemented in Zambia increased the rapidity and uptake of ART, as well as retention on ART at 12 months, although overall retention on ART remained suboptimal. UTT policies reduced disparities in treatment initiation, but not 12-month retention on ART. Natural experiments reveal both the anticipated and unanticipated effects of real-world implementation and indicate the need for new strategies leveraging the short-term effects of UTT to cultivate long-term treatment success. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Estimating the real-world effects of expanding antiretroviral treatment eligibility: Evidence from a regression discontinuity analysis in Zambia.
(2018-Jun) Mody A; Sikazwe I; Czaicki NL; Wa Mwanza M; Savory T; Sikombe K; Beres LK; Somwe P; Roy M; Pry JM; Padian N; Bolton-Moore C; Holmes CB; Geng EH; Department of Public Health, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.; Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.; Division of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, United States of America.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Although randomized trials have established the clinical efficacy of treating all persons living with HIV (PLWHs), expanding treatment eligibility in the real world may have additional behavioral effects (e.g., changes in retention) or lead to unintended consequences (e.g., crowding out sicker patients owing to increased patient volume). Using a regression discontinuity design, we sought to assess the effects of a previous change to Zambia's HIV treatment guidelines increasing the threshold for treatment eligibility from 350 to 500 cells/μL to anticipate effects of current global efforts to treat all PLWHs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve adults who newly enrolled in HIV care in a network of 64 clinics operated by the Zambian Ministry of Health and supported by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ). Patients were restricted to those enrolling in a narrow window around the April 1, 2014 change to Zambian HIV treatment guidelines that raised the CD4 threshold for treatment from 350 to 500 cells/μL (i.e., August 1, 2013, to November 1, 2014). Clinical and sociodemographic data were obtained from an electronic medical record system used in routine care. We used a regression discontinuity design to estimate the effects of this change in treatment eligibility on ART initiation within 3 months of enrollment, retention in care at 6 months (defined as clinic attendance between 3 and 9 months after enrollment), and a composite of both ART initiation by 3 months and retention in care at 6 months in all new enrollees. We also performed an instrumental variable (IV) analysis to quantify the effect of actually initiating ART because of this guideline change on retention. Overall, 34,857 ART-naïve patients (39.1% male, median age 34 years [IQR 28-41], median CD4 268 cells/μL [IQR 134-430]) newly enrolled in HIV care during this period; 23,036 were analyzed after excluding patients around the threshold to allow for clinic-to-clinic variations in actual guideline uptake. In all newly enrolling patients, expanding the CD4 threshold for treatment from 350 to 500 cells/μL was associated with a 13.6% absolute increase in ART initiation within 3 months of enrollment (95% CI, 11.1%-16.2%), a 4.1% absolute increase in retention at 6 months (95% CI, 1.6%-6.7%), and a 10.8% absolute increase in the percentage of patients who initiated ART by 3 months and were retained at six months (95% CI, 8.1%-13.5%). These effects were greatest in patients who would have become newly eligible for ART with the change in guidelines: a 43.7% increase in ART initiation by 3 months (95% CI, 37.5%-49.9%), 13.6% increase in retention at six months (95% CI, 7.3%-20.0%), and a 35.5% increase in the percentage of patients on ART at 3 months and still in care at 6 months [95% CI, 29.2%-41.9%). We did not observe decreases in ART initiation or retention in patients not directly targeted by the guideline change. An IV analysis found that initiating ART in response to the guideline change led to a 37.9% (95% CI, 28.8%-46.9%) absolute increase in retention in care. Limitations of this study include uncertain generalizability under newer models of care, lack of laboratory data (e.g., viral load), inability to account for earlier stages in the HIV care cascade (e.g., HIV testing and linkage), and potential for misclassification of eligibility status or outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, guidelines raising the CD4 threshold for treatment from 350 to 500 cells/μL were associated with a rapid rise in ART initiation as well as enhanced retention among newly treatment-eligible patients, without negatively impacting patients with lower CD4 levels. These data suggest that health systems in Zambia and other high-prevalence settings could substantially enhance engagement even among those with high CD4 levels (i.e., above 500 cells/μL) by expanding treatment without undermining existing care standards.
Evaluation of kidney function among people living with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy in Zambia.
(2022) Pry JM; Vinikoor MJ; Bolton Moore C; Roy M; Mody A; Sikazwe I; Sharma A; Chihota B; Duran-Frigola M; Daultrey H; Mutale J; Kerkhoff AD; Geng EH; Pollock BH; Vera JH; School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.; School of Medicine University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.; Ersilia Open Source Initiative, Cambridge, United Kingdom.; School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.; School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
As the response to the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa continues to mature, a growing number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) are aging and risk for non-communicable diseases increases. Routine laboratory tests of serum creatinine have been conducted to assess HIV treatment (ART) suitability. Here we utilize those measures to assess kidney function impairment among those initiating ART. Identification of non-communicable disease (NCD) risks among those in HIV care creates opportunity to improve public health through care referral and/or NCD/HIV care integration. We estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) using routinely collected serum creatinine measures among a cohort of PLHIV with an HIV care visit at one of 113 Centre for Infectious Disease Research Zambia (CIDRZ) supported sites between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017, across seven of the ten provinces in Zambia. We used mixed-effect Poisson regression to assess predictors of eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 allowing random effects at the individual and facility level. Additionally, we assessed agreement between four eGFR formulae with unadjusted CKD-EPI as a standard using Scott/Fleiss method across five categories of kidney function. A total of 72,933 observations among 68,534 individuals met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of the 68,534, the majority were female 41,042 (59.8%), the median age was 34 (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-40), and median CD4 cell count was 292 (IQR: 162-435). The proportion of individuals with an eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 was 6.9% (95% CI: 6.7-7.1%) according to the unadjusted CKD-EPI equation. There was variation in agreement across eGFR formulas considered compared to unadjusted CKD-EPI (χ2 p-value <0.001). Estimated GFR less than 60ml/min/1.73m2, per the unadjusted CKD-EPI equation, was significantly associated with age, sex, body mass index, and blood pressure. Using routine serum creatinine measures, we identified a significant proportion of individuals with eGFR indicating moderate or great kidney function impairment among PLHIV initiating ART in Zambia. It is possible that differentiated service delivery models could be developed to address this subset of those in HIV care with increased risk of chronic kidney disease.
Human-Centered Design Lessons for Implementation Science: Improving the Implementation of a Patient-Centered Care Intervention.
(2019-Dec) Beres LK; Simbeza S; Holmes CB; Mwamba C; Mukamba N; Sharma A; Munamunungu V; Mwachande M; Sikombe K; Bolton Moore C; Mody A; Koyuncu A; Christopoulos K; Jere L; Pry J; Ehrenkranz PD; Budden A; Geng E; Sikazwe I; Georgetown University, Washington, DC.; Department of Interna6onal Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.; D'EVA Consulting, Washington, DC.; The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based HIV interventions often fail to reach anticipated impact due to insufficient utilization in real-world health systems. Human-centered design (HCD) represents a novel approach in tailoring innovations to fit end-users, narrowing the gap between efficacious interventions and impact at scale. METHODS: We combined a narrative literature review of HCD in HIV programs with our experience using HCD to redesign an intervention promoting patient-centered care (PCC) practices among health care workers (HCW) in Zambia. We summarize the use and results of HCD in the global HIV response and share case study insights to advance conceptualization of HCD applications. RESULTS: The literature review identified 13 articles (representing 7 studies) on the use of HCD in HIV. All studies featured HCD hallmarks including empathy development, user-driven inquiry, ideation, and iterative refinement. HCD was applied to mHealth design, a management intervention and pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery. Our HCD application addressed a behavioral service delivery target: changing HCW patient-centered beliefs, attitudes, and practices. Through in-depth developer-user interaction, our HCD approach revealed specific HCW support for and resistance to PCC, suggesting intervention revisions to improve feasibility and acceptability and PCC considerations that could inform implementation in transferable settings. CONCLUSIONS: As both a research and implementation tool, HCD has potential to improve effective implementation of the HIV response, particularly for product development; new intervention introduction; and complex system interventions. Further research on HCD application strengths and limitations is needed. Those promoting PCC may improve implementation success by seeking out resonance and anticipating the challenges our HCD process identified.
'I need time to start antiretroviral therapy': understanding reasons for delayed ART initiation among people diagnosed with HIV in Lusaka, Zambia'.
(2022-Dec) Mwamba C; Beres LK; Topp SM; Mukamba N; Simbeza S; Sikombe K; Mody A; Geng E; Holmes CB; Kennedy CE; Sikazwe I; Denison JA; Bolton Moore C; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; College of Public Health, Medical & Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
INTRODUCTION: Rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation can improve patient outcomes such as viral suppression and prevent new infections. However, not everyone who can start ART does so immediately. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study to inform interventions supporting rapid initiation in the 'Test and Start' era. We purposively sampled 20 adult patients living with HIV and a previous gap in care from ten health facilities in Lusaka, Zambia for interviews. We inductively analysed transcripts using a thematic, narrative approach. In their narratives, seven participants discussed delaying ART initiation. RESULTS: Drawing on messages gleaned from facility-based counselling and community information, many cited greater fear of rapid sickness or death due to imperfect adherence or treatment side effects than negative health consequences due to delayed initiation. Participants described needing time to 'prepare' their minds for a lifetime treatment commitment. Concerns about inadvertent HIV status disclosure during drug collection discouraged immediate initiation, as did feeling healthy, and worries about the impact of ART initiation on relationship dynamics. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that counselling messages should accurately communicate treatment risks, without perpetuating fear-based narratives about HIV. Identifying and managing patient-specific concerns and reasons for the 'need for time' may be important for supporting individuals to rapidly accept lifelong treatment.Key messagesFear-based adherence messaging in health facilities about the dangers of missing a treatment dose or changing the time when ART is taken contributes to Zambian patients' refusals of immediate ART initiationResponsive health systems that balance a stated need for time to accept one's diagnosis and prepare to embark on a lifelong treatment plan with interventions to identify and manage patient-specific treatment related fears and concerns may support more rapid ART initiationPerceived social stigma around HIV continues to be a significant challenge for treatment initiation.
Improved Retention With 6-Month Clinic Return Intervals for Stable Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in Zambia.
(2018-Jan-06) Mody A; Roy M; Sikombe K; Savory T; Holmes C; Bolton-Moore C; Padian N; Sikazwe I; Geng E; Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of HIV, ID, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham.; Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Extending appointment intervals for stable HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa can reduce patient opportunity costs and decongest overcrowded facilities. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of stable HIV-infected adults (on treatment with CD4 >200 cells/μL for more than 6 months) who presented for clinic visits in Lusaka, Zambia. We used multilevel, mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for patient characteristics, including prior retention, to assess the association between scheduled appointment intervals and subsequent missed visits (>14 days late to next visit), gaps in medication (>14 days late to next pharmacy refill), and loss to follow-up (LTFU; >90 days late to next visit). RESULTS: A total of 62084 patients (66.6% female, median age 38, median CD4 438 cells/μL) made 501281 visits while stable on antiretroviral therapy. Most visits were scheduled around 1-month (25.0% clinical, 44.4% pharmacy) or 3-month intervals (49.8% clinical, 35.2% pharmacy), with fewer patients scheduled at 6-month intervals (10.3% clinical, 0.4% pharmacy). After adjustment and compared to patients scheduled to return in 1 month, patients with six-month clinic return intervals were the least likely to miss visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.24); miss medication pickups (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.39-0.57), and become LTFU prior to the next visit (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month clinic return intervals were associated with decreased lateness, gaps in medication, and LTFU in stable HIV-infected patients and may represent a promising strategy to reduce patient burdens and decongest clinics.
Longitudinal Care Cascade Outcomes Among People Eligible for Antiretroviral Therapy Who Are Newly Linking to Care in Zambia: A Multistate Analysis.
(2020-Dec-17) Mody A; Glidden DV; Eshun-Wilson I; Sikombe K; Simbeza S; Mukamba N; Somwe P; Beres LK; Pry J; Bolton-Moore C; Padian N; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Geng EH; Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.; Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Retention in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care is dynamic, with patients frequently transitioning in and out of care. Analytical approaches (eg, survival analyses) commonly used to assess HIV care cascade outcomes fail to capture such transitions and therefore incompletely represent care outcomes over time. METHODS: We analyzed antiretroviral therapy (ART)-eligible adults newly linking to care at 64 clinics in Zambia between 1 April 2014 and 31 July 2015. We used electronic medical record data and supplemented these with updated care outcomes ascertained by tracing a multistage random sample of patients lost to follow-up (LTFU, >90 days late for last appointment). We performed multistate analyses, incorporating weights from sampling, to estimate the prevalence of 9 care states over time since linkage with respect to ART initiation, retention in care, transfers, and mortality. RESULTS: In sum, 23 227 patients (58% female; median age 34 years [interquartile range 28-41]) were ART-eligible at enrollment. At 1 year, 75.2% had initiated ART and were in care: 61.8% were continuously retained, 6.1% had reengaged after LTFU, and 7.3% had transferred. Also, 10.1% were LTFU within 7 days of enrollment, and 15.2% were LTFU at 1 year (6.7% prior to ART). One year after LTFU, 51.6% of those LTFU prior to ART remained out of care compared to 30.2% of those LTFU after initiating ART. Overall, 6.9% of patients had died by 1 year with 3.0% dying prior to ART. CONCLUSION: Multistate analyses provide more complete assessments of longitudinal HIV cascade outcomes and reveal treatment gaps at distinct timepoints in care that will still need to be addressed even with universal treatment.
Longitudinal engagement trajectories and risk of death among new ART starters in Zambia: A group-based multi-trajectory analysis.
(2019-Oct) Mody A; Eshun-Wilson I; Sikombe K; Schwartz SR; Beres LK; Simbeza S; Mukamba N; Somwe P; Bolton-Moore C; Padian N; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Geng EH; Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.; Division of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, United States of America.; Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Retention in HIV treatment must be improved to advance the HIV response, but research to characterize gaps in retention has focused on estimates from single time points and population-level averages. These approaches do not assess the engagement patterns of individual patients over time and fail to account for both their dynamic nature and the heterogeneity between patients. We apply group-based trajectory analysis-a special application of latent class analysis to longitudinal data-among new antiretroviral therapy (ART) starters in Zambia to identify groups defined by engagement patterns over time and to assess their association with mortality. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed a cohort of HIV-infected adults who newly started ART between August 1, 2013, and February 1, 2015, across 64 clinics in Zambia. We performed group-based multi-trajectory analysis to identify subgroups with distinct trajectories in medication possession ratio (MPR, a validated adherence metric based on pharmacy refill data) over the past 3 months and loss to follow-up (LTFU, >90 days late for last visit) among patients with at least 180 days of observation time. We used multinomial logistic regression to identify baseline factors associated with belonging to particular trajectory groups. We obtained Kaplan-Meier estimates with bootstrapped confidence intervals of the cumulative incidence of mortality stratified by trajectory group and performed adjusted Poisson regression to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) for mortality by trajectory group. Inverse probability weights were applied to all analyses to account for updated outcomes ascertained from tracing a random subset of patients lost to follow-up as of July 31, 2015. Overall, 38,879 patients (63.3% female, median age 35 years [IQR 29-41], median enrollment CD4 count 280 cells/μl [IQR 146-431]) were included in our cohort. Analyses revealed 6 trajectory groups among the new ART starters: (1) 28.5% of patients demonstrated consistently high adherence and retention; (2) 22.2% showed early nonadherence but consistent retention; (3) 21.6% showed gradually decreasing adherence and retention; (4) 8.6% showed early LTFU with later reengagement; (5) 8.7% had early LTFU without reengagement; and (6) 10.4% had late LTFU without reengagement. Identified groups exhibited large differences in survival: after adjustment, the "early LTFU with reengagement" group (aIRR 3.4 [95% CI 1.2-9.7], p = 0.019), the "early LTFU" group (aIRR 6.4 [95% CI 2.5-16.3], p < 0.001), and the "late LTFU" group (aIRR 4.7 [95% CI 2.0-11.3], p = 0.001) had higher rates of mortality as compared to the group with consistently high adherence/retention. Limitations of this study include using data observed after baseline to identify trajectory groups and to classify patients into these groups, excluding patients who died or transferred within the first 180 days, and the uncertain generalizability of the data to current care standards. CONCLUSIONS: Among new ART starters in Zambia, we observed 6 patient subgroups that demonstrated distinctive engagement trajectories over time and that were associated with marked differences in the subsequent risk of mortality. Further efforts to develop tailored intervention strategies for different types of engagement behaviors, monitor early engagement to identify higher-risk patients, and better understand the determinants of these heterogeneous behaviors can help improve care delivery and survival in this population.
Mitigating the effects of COVID-19 on HIV treatment and care in Lusaka, Zambia: a before-after cohort study using mixed effects regression.
(2022-Jan) Pry JM; Sikombe K; Mody A; Iyer S; Mutale J; Vlahakis N; Savory T; Wa Mwanza M; Mweebo K; Mwila A; Mwale C; Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya M; Kerkhoff AD; Sikazwe I; Bolton Moore C; Mwamba D; Geng EH; Herce ME; Department of Infectious Disease, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.; San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California, USA.; Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Global HIV & Tuberculosis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia jmpry@ucdavis.edu.; Institute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
INTRODUCTION: The Zambian Ministry of Health (MoH) issued COVID-19 mitigation guidance for HIV care immediately after the first COVID-19 case was confirmed in Zambia on 18 March 2020. The Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia implemented MoH guidance by: 1) extending antiretroviral therapy (ART) refill duration to 6 multi-month dispensation (6MMD) and 2) task-shifting communication and mobilisation of those in HIV care to collect their next ART refill early. We assessed the impact of COVID-19 mitigation guidance on HIV care 3 months before and after guidance implementation. METHODS: We reviewed all ART pharmacy visit data in the national HIV medical record for PLHIV in care having ≥1 visit between 1 January-30 June 2020 at 59 HIV care facilities in Lusaka Province, Zambia. We undertook a before-after evaluation using mixed-effects Poisson regression to examine predictors and marginal probability of early clinic return (pharmacy visit >7 days before next appointment), proportion of late visit (>7 days late for next appointment) and probability of receiving a 6MMD ART refill. RESULTS: A total of 101 371 individuals (64% female, median age 39) with 130 486 pharmacy visits were included in the analysis. We observed a significant increase in the adjusted prevalence ratio (4.63; 95% CI 4.45 to 4.82) of early return before compared with after guidance implementation. Receipt of 6MMD increased from a weekly mean of 47.9% (95% CI 46.6% to 49.2%) before to 73.4% (95% CI 72.0% to 74.9%) after guidance implementation. The proportion of late visits (8-89 days late) was significantly higher before (18.8%, 95% CI17.2%to20.2%) compared with after (15.1%, 95% CI13.8%to16.4%) guidance implementation . CONCLUSIONS: Timely issuance and implementation of COVID-19 mitigation guidance involving task-shifted patient communication and mobilisation alongside 6MMD significantly increased early return to ART clinic, potentially reducing interruptions in HIV care during a global public health emergency.
Novel Longitudinal Methods for Assessing Retention in Care: a Synthetic Review.
(2021-Aug) Mody A; Tram KH; Glidden DV; Eshun-Wilson I; Sikombe K; Mehrotra M; Pry JM; Geng EH; Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 4523 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA. aaloke.mody@wustl.edu.; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 4523 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Retention in care is both dynamic and longitudinal in nature, but current approaches to retention often reduce these complex histories into cross-sectional metrics that obscure the nuanced experiences of patients receiving HIV care. In this review, we discuss contemporary approaches to assessing retention in care that captures its dynamic nature and the methodological and data considerations to do so. RECENT FINDINGS: Enhancing retention measurements either through patient tracing or "big data" approaches (including probabilistic matching) to link databases from different sources can be used to assess longitudinal retention from the perspective of the patient when they transition in and out of care and access care at different facilities. Novel longitudinal analytic approaches such as multi-state and group-based trajectory analyses are designed specifically for assessing metrics that can change over time such as retention in care. Multi-state analyses capture the transitions individuals make in between different retention states over time and provide a comprehensive depiction of longitudinal population-level outcomes. Group-based trajectory analyses can identify patient subgroups that follow distinctive retention trajectories over time and highlight the heterogeneity of retention patterns across the population. Emerging approaches to longitudinally measure retention in care provide nuanced assessments that reveal unique insights into different care gaps at different time points over an individuals' treatment. These methods help meet the needs of the current scientific agenda for retention and reveal important opportunities for developing more tailored interventions that target the varied care challenges patients may face over the course of lifelong treatment.
Patient-reported Reasons for Stopping Care or Switching Clinics in Zambia: A Multisite, Regionally Representative Estimate Using a Multistage Sampling-based Approach in Zambia.
(2021-Oct-05) Sikazwe I; Eshun-Wilson I; Sikombe K; Beres LK; Somwe P; Mody A; Simbeza S; Bukankala C; Glidden DV; Mulenga LB; Padian N; Ehrenkranz P; Bolton-Moore C; Holmes CB; Geng EH; Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.; University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Understanding patient-reported reasons for lapses of retention in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment can drive improvements in the care cascade. A systematic assessment of outcomes among a random sample of patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) from 32 clinics in Zambia to understand the reasons for silent transfers and disengagement from care was undertaken. METHODS: We traced a simple random sample of LTFU patients (>90 days from last scheduled visit) as determined from clinic-based electronic medical records from a probability sample of facilities. Among patients found in person, we solicited reasons for either stopping or switching care and predictors for re-engagement. We coded reasons into structural, psychosocial, and clinic-based barriers. RESULTS: Among 1751 LTFU patients traced and found alive, 31% of patients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) between 1 July 2013 and 31 July 2015 silently transferred or were disengaged (40% male; median age, 35 years; median CD4 level, 239 cells/μL); median time on ART at LTFU was 480 days (interquartile range, 110-1295). Among the 544 patients not in care, median prevalences for patient-reported structural, psychosocial, and clinic-level barriers were 27.3%, 13.9%, and 13.4%, respectively, and were highly variable across facilities. Structural reasons, including, "relocated to a new place" were mostly cited among 289 patients who silently transferred (35.5%). We found that men were less likely to re-engage in care than women (odds ratio, .39; 95% confidence interval, .22-.67; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve retention of patients on ART may need to be tailored at the facility level to address patient-reported barriers.
Patterns and Predictors of Incident Return to HIV Care Among Traced, Disengaged Patients in Zambia: Analysis of a Prospective Cohort.
(2021-Mar-01) Beres LK; Schwartz S; Simbeza S; McGready J; Eshun-Wilson I; Mwamba C; Sikombe K; Topp SM; Somwe P; Mody A; Mukamba N; Ehrenkranz PD; Padian N; Pry J; Moore CB; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Denison JA; Geng E; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.; The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.; Division of Epidemiology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; and.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, University of Washington, St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.; College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Dynamic movement of patients in and out of HIV care is prevalent, but there is limited information on patterns of patient re-engagement or predictors of return to guide HIV programs to better support patient engagement. METHODS: From a probability-based sample of lost to follow-up, adult patients traced by peer educators from 31 Zambian health facilities, we prospectively followed disengaged HIV patients for return clinic visits. We estimated the cumulative incidence of return and the time to return using Kaplan-Meier methods. We used univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to conduct a risk factor analysis identifying predictors of incident return across a social ecological framework. RESULTS: Of the 556 disengaged patients, 73.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.0 to 83.8] returned to HIV care. The median follow-up time from disengagement was 32.3 months (interquartile range: 23.6-38.9). The rate of return decreased with time postdisengagement. Independent predictors of incident return included a previous gap in care [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 1.95, 95% CI: 1.23 to 3.09] and confronting a stigmatizer once in the past year (aHR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.65). Compared with a rural facility, patients were less likely to return if they sought care from an urban facility (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.96) or hospital (aHR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to hasten re-engagement in HIV care. Early and differential interventions by time since disengagement may improve intervention effectiveness. Patients in urban and tertiary care settings may need additional support. Improving patient resilience, outreach after a care gap, and community stigma reduction may facilitate return. Future re-engagement research should include causal evaluation of identified factors.
Patterns of person-centred communications in public HIV clinics: a latent class analysis using the Roter interaction analysis system.
(2023-Jul) Mukamba N; Mwamba C; Redkar S; Foloko M; Lumbo K; Nyirenda H; Roter DL; Mulabe M; Sharma A; Simbeza S; Sikombe K; Beres LK; Pry JM; Christopoulos K; Holmes CB; Geng EH; Sikazwe I; Bolton-Moore C; Mody A; University of Washington St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.; Department of Health, Behaviour and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.; Centre for Global Health and Quality, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
INTRODUCTION: Poor client-provider communication is a critical barrier to long-term retention in care among people living with HIV. However, standardized assessments of this key metric are limited in Africa. We used the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) to quantitatively characterize patterns of person-centred communication (PCC) behaviours in Zambia. METHODS: We enrolled pairs of people living with HIV making routine HIV follow-up visit and their providers at 24 Ministry of Health-facilities supported by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia in Lusaka province between August 2019 and November 2021. Client-provider encounters were audio-recorded and coded using RIAS by trained research staff. We performed latent class analysis to identify interactions with distinctive patterns of provider PCC behaviours (i.e. rapport building, person-centred counselling, PCC micropractices [e.g. brief empathy statements], assessing barriers to care, shared decision-making and leveraging discretionary power) and compared their distribution across client, provider, interaction and facility characteristics. RESULTS: We enrolled 478 people living with HIV and 139 providers (14% nurses, 73.6% clinical officers, 12.3% were medical officers). We identified four distinct profiles: (1) "Medically Oriented Interaction, Minimal PCC Behaviours" (47.6% of interactions) was characterized by medical discussion, minimal psychosocial/non-medical talk and low use of PCC behaviours; (2) "Balanced Medical/Non-medical Interaction, Low PCC Behaviours" (21.0%) was characterized by medical and non-medical discussion but limited use of other PCC behaviours; (3) "Medically Oriented Interaction, Good PCC Behaviours" (23.9%) was characterized by medically oriented discussion, more information-giving and increased use of PCC behaviours; and (4) "Highly person-centred Interaction" (7.5%) was characterized by both balanced medical/non-medical focus and the highest use of PCC behaviours. Nurse interactions were more likely to be characterized by more PCC behaviours (i.e. Class 3 or 4) (44.8%), followed by medical officers (33.9%) and clinical officers (27.3%) (p = 0.031). Longer interactions were also more likely to integrate more PCC behaviours (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCC behaviours are relatively uncommon in HIV care in Zambia, and often limited to brief rapport-building statements and PCC micropractices. Strengthening PCC, such as shared decision-making and leveraging discretionary power to better accommodate client needs and preferences, may be an important strategy for improving the quality in HIV treatment programmes.
Person-centred interventions to improve patient-provider relationships for HIV services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
(2024-May) Beres LK; Underwood A; Le Tourneau N; Kemp CG; Kore G; Yaeger L; Li J; Aaron A; Keene C; Mallela DP; Khalifa BAA; Mody A; Schwartz SR; Baral S; Mwamba C; Sikombe K; Eshun-Wilson I; Geng EH; Lavoie MC; Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Oxford University, Oxford, UK.; Center for International Health Education and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
INTRODUCTION: Person-centred care (PCC) has been recognized as a critical element in delivering quality and responsive health services. The patient-provider relationship, conceptualized at the core of PCC in multiple models, remains largely unexamined in HIV care. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the types of PCC interventions implemented to improve patient-provider interactions and how these interventions have improved HIV care continuum outcomes and person-reported outcomes (PROs) among people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We searched databases, conference proceedings and conducted manual targeted searches to identify randomized trials and observational studies published up to January 2023. The PCC search terms were guided by the Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness by Scholl. We included person-centred interventions aiming to enhance the patient-provider interactions. We included HIV care continuum outcomes and PROs. RESULTS: We included 28 unique studies: 18 (64.3%) were quantitative, eight (28.6.%) were mixed methods and two (7.1%) were qualitative. Within PCC patient-provider interventions, we inductively identified five categories of PCC interventions: (1) providing friendly and welcoming services; (2) patient empowerment and improved communication skills (e.g. supporting patient-led skills such as health literacy and approaches when communicating with a provider); (3) improved individualized counselling and patient-centred communication (e.g. supporting provider skills such as training on motivational interviewing); (4) audit and feedback; and (5) provider sensitisation to patient experiences and identities. Among the included studies with a comparison arm and effect size reported, 62.5% reported a significant positive effect of the intervention on at least one HIV care continuum outcome, and 100% reported a positive effect of the intervention on at least one of the included PROs. DISCUSSION: Among published HIV PCC interventions, there is heterogeneity in the components of PCC addressed, the actors involved and the expected outcomes. While results are also heterogeneous across clinical and PROs, there is more evidence for significant improvement in PROs. Further research is necessary to better understand the clinical implications of PCC, with fewer studies measuring linkage or long-term retention or viral suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Improved understanding of PCC domains, mechanisms and consistency of measurement will advance PCC research and implementation.
Profiles of HIV Care Disruptions Among Adult Patients Lost to Follow-up in Zambia: A Latent Class Analysis.
(2021-Jan-01) Mody A; Sikombe K; Beres LK; Simbeza S; Mukamba N; Eshun-Wilson I; Schwartz S; Pry J; Padian N; Holmes CB; Bolton-Moore C; Sikazwe I; Geng EH; Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.; Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; and.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
BACKGROUND: Patients report varied barriers to HIV care across multiple domains, but specific barrier patterns may be driven by underlying, but unobserved, behavioral profiles. METHODS: We traced a probability sample of patients lost to follow-up (>90 days late) as of July 31, 2015 from 64 clinics in Zambia. Among those found alive, we ascertained patient-reported reasons for care disruptions. We performed latent class analysis to identify patient subgroups with similar patterns of reasons reported and assessed the association between class membership and care status (ie, disengaged versus silently transferred to a new site). RESULTS: Among 547 patients, we identified 5 profiles of care disruptions: (1) "Livelihood and Mobility" (30.6% of the population) reported work/school obligations and mobility/travel as reasons for care disruptions; (2) "Clinic Accessibility" (28.9%) reported challenges with attending clinic; (3) "Mobility and Family" (21.9%) reported family obligations, mobility/travel, and transport-related reasons; (4) "Doubting Need for HIV care" (10.2%) reported uncertainty around HIV status or need for clinical care, and (5) "Multidimensional Barriers to Care" (8.3%) reported numerous (mean 5.6) reasons across multiple domains. Patient profiles were significantly associated with care status. The "Doubting Need for HIV Care" class were mostly disengaged (97.9%), followed by the "Multidimensional Barriers to Care" (62.8%), "Clinic Accessibility" (62.4%), "Livelihood and Mobility" (43.6%), and "Mobility and Family" (23.5%) classes. CONCLUSION: There are distinct HIV care disruption profiles that are strongly associated with patients' current engagement status. Interventions targeting these unique profiles may enable more effective and tailored strategies for improving HIV treatment outcomes.
"Provider discretionary power practices to support implementation of patient-centered HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia".
(2022) Mwamba C; Mukamba N; Sharma A; Lumbo K; Foloko M; Nyirenda H; Simbeza S; Sikombe K; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Moore CB; Mody A; Geng E; Beres LK; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.; Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Centre, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
INTRODUCTION: Traditional patient-provider relationships privilege the providers, as they possess the formal authority and clinical knowledge applied to address illness, but providers also have discretion over how they exercise their power to influence patients' services, benefits, and sanctions. In this study, we assessed providers' exercise of discretionary power in implementing patient-centered care (PCC) practices in Lusaka, Zambia. METHODS: HIV clinical encounters between patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and providers across 24 public health facilities in Lusaka Province were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified practices of discretionary power (DP) employed in the implementation of PCC and instances of withholding DP. A codebook of DP practices was inductively and iteratively developed. We compared outcomes across provider cadres and within sites over time. RESULTS: We captured 194 patient-provider interactions at 24 study sites involving 11 Medical Officers, 58 Clinical Officers and 10 Nurses between August 2019 to May 2021. Median interaction length was 7.5 min. In a hierarchy where providers dominate patients and interactions are rapid, some providers invited patients to ask questions and responded at length with information that could increase patient understanding and agency. Others used inclusive language, welcomed patients, conducted introductions, and apologized for delayed services, narrowing the hierarchical distance between patient and provider, and facilitating recognition of the patient as a partner in care. Although less common, providers shared their decision-making powers, allowing patients to choose appointment dates and influence regimens. They also facilitated resource access, including access to services and providers outside of scheduled appointment times. Application of DP was not universal and missed opportunities were identified. CONCLUSION: Supporting providers to recognize their power and intentionally share it is both inherent to the practice of PCC (e.g., making a patient a partner), and a way to implement improved patient support. More research is needed to understand the application of DP practices in improving the patient-centeredness of care in non-ART settings.
Provider perspectives on patient-centredness: participatory formative research and rapid analysis methods to inform the design and implementation of a facility-based HIV care improvement intervention in Zambia.
(2023-Jul) Mwamba C; Beres LK; Mukamba N; Jere L; Foloko M; Lumbo K; Sikombe K; Simbeza S; Mody A; Pry JM; Holmes CB; Sikazwe I; Moore CB; Christopoulos K; Sharma A; Geng EH; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; University of Washington, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
INTRODUCTION: Implementation of patient-centred care (PCC) practices in HIV treatment depends on healthcare workers' (HCWs) perceptions of the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of such practices (e.g. use of intentional, metric-driven activities to improve patient experiences). METHODS: We applied rapid, rigorous formative research methods to refine a PCC intervention for future trial. In 2018, we conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with 46 HCWs purposefully selected from two pilot sites. We elicited HCW perceptions of HIV service delivery, HCW motivation and perceived value of patient experience measures intended to improve PCC. FGDs utilized participatory methods to understand HCW responses to patient-reported care engagement challenges and Scholl's PCC Framework principles (e.g. seeing a patient as a unique person), enablers (e.g. care coordination) and activities (e.g. patient involvement). Our rapid analysis used analytic memos, thematic analysis, research team debriefs and HCW feedback to inform time-sensitive trial implementation. RESULTS: While HCWs nearly universally identified with and supported principles of PCC in both facilities, they raised practical barriers given the practice environment. HCWs described motivation to help patients, attached value to seeing positive health outcomes and the importance of teamwork. However, HCWs reported challenges with enablers needed to deliver PCC. HCWs cited a work culture characterized by differential power dynamics between cadres and departments restricting HCW autonomy and resource access. Barriers included inflexibility in accommodating individual patient needs due to high patient volumes, limited human resources, laboratory capacity, infrastructure and skills translating patient perspectives into practice. HCW motivation was negatively influenced by encounters with "difficult patients," and feeling "unappreciated" by management, resulting in cognitive dissonance between HCW beliefs and behaviours. However, the enactment of PCC values also occurred. Results suggested that PCC interventions should reduce practice barriers, highlighting the value of mentors who could help HCWs dynamically engage with health system constraints, to facilitate PCC. CONCLUSIONS: While HCWs perceived PCC principles as acceptable, they did not think it universally appropriate or feasible given the practice environment. Participatory and rapid methods provided timely insight that PCC interventions must provide clear and effective systems enabling PCC activities by measuring and mitigating relational and organizational constraints amenable to change such as inter-cadre coordination.