Browsing by Author "Mulabe, Musunge"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Cross-sectional study to assess depression among healthcare workers in Lusaka, Zambia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(2023-Apr-05) Simbeza, Sandra; Mutale, Jacob; Mulabe, Musunge; Jere, Lazarus; Bukankala, Chama; Sikombe, Kombatende; Sikazwe, Izukanji; Bolton-Moore, Carolyn; Mody, Aaloke; Geng, Elvin H.; Sharma, Anjali; Beres, Laura K.; Pry, Jake M.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess depression among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the context of COVID-19 in Lusaka Province, Zambia. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study is nested within a larger study, the Person-Centred Public Health for HIV Treatment in Zambia (PCPH), a cluster-randomised trial to assess HIV care and outcomes. SETTING: The research was conducted in 24 government-run health facilities from 11 August to 15 October 2020 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Lusaka, Zambia. PARTICIPANTS: We used convenience sampling to recruit HCW participants who were previously enrolled in the PCPH study, had more than 6 months' experience working at the facility and were voluntarily willing to participate. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We implemented the well-validated 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess HCW depression. We used mixed-effects, adjusted Poisson regression to estimate the marginal probability of HCWs experiencing depression that may warrant intervention (PHQ-9 score ≥5) by healthcare facility. RESULTS: We collected PHQ-9 survey responses from 713 professional and lay HCWs. Overall, 334 (46.8%, 95% CI 43.1%, 50.6%) HCWs recorded a PHQ-9 score ≥5, indicating the need for further assessment and potential intervention for depression. We identified significant heterogeneity across facilities and observed a greater proportion of HCWs with symptoms of depression in facilities providing COVID-19 testing and treatment services. CONCLUSIONS: Depression may be a concern for a large proportion of HCWs in Zambia. Further work to understand the magnitude and aetiologies of depression among HCWs in the public sector is needed to design effective prevention and treatment interventions to meet the needs for mental health support and to minimise poor health outcomes.
Effect of a person-centered care intervention on return and sustained reengagement after treatment interruptions from HIV care in Zambia: A post-hoc analysis of a stepped-wedged cluster randomized trial.
(2026-Sep) Mody, Aaloke; Sikombe, Kombatende; Simbeza, Sandra ; Mukamba, Njekwa ; Beres, Laura K.; Pry, Jake M.; Sharma, Anjali; Mutale, Jacob; Dube, Alida Z.; Mulabe, Musunge; Mulenga, Lloyd ; Sivile, Suilanji; Ratliff, April; Goss, Charles W.; Holmes, Charles B.; Bolton-Moore, Carolyn ; Sikazwe, Izukanji; Geng, Elvin H.
BACKGROUND: Poor client-provider interactions lead to reinforcing cycles of treatment interruptions (TIs) from HIV care and fear of return, undermining sustained retention. We previously demonstrated a multi-component person-centered care intervention (PCC) targeting healthcare worker (HCW) behavior improved client experience and retention in HIV care. To understand mechanisms of improved retention, we evaluated the effect of the PCC intervention on return after TIs and sustained retention after return in a post-hoc analysis, hypothesizing that friendlier HCW attitudes enable successful reengagement into care. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We implemented the PCC intervention at 24 clinics in Zambia in a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial from Aug 2019 to Nov 2021. Clinics were allocated into 4 groups (8 clinics in Groups 1 and 4, and 4 each in Groups 2 and 3) and randomly assigned to crossover from control to intervention every 6 months. Under control, clinics provided routine HIV care without additional support. Afterwards, clinics received the PCC intervention targeting caring aspects of HCW behavior with 1) training and coaching on PCC practices, 2) measurement and feedback of client experience (via exit interviews), and 3) small facility-level incentives. We examined individuals living with HIV who became >30 days late to a scheduled visit (i.e., TI), categorizing intervention exposure based on the last visit prior to TI. We used electronic health records to assess the effect of the PCC intervention on 1) return to HIV care after a TI, and 2) repeat TIs among those who returned. We used multistate analytic methods to estimate crude incidence of return and repeat TIs and prevalence of being in care at 1-year. We used shared frailty Cox proportional hazards and mixed-effects Poisson models to obtain formal comparisons that accounted for the stepped-wedge design. Individuals were censored at intervention crossover or database closure. During the study period, 128,910 clients (n = 69,671 control, n = 59,239 intervention) became >30 days late (64.3% female, median age 38y [IQR 31,45], median years in care 2.5y [IQR 0.6,6.7]). The PCC intervention increased incidence of return after TI at 12-months (72.3% intervention versus 67.7% control, crude risk difference [RD] +4.6% [CI 4.1,5.2], adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.16 [CI 1.12,1.20]; p < 0.001). Among returners, the intervention decreased incidence of repeat TIs (44.3% versus 55.6%, RD -11.4% [CI -12.2,-10.6], aHR 0.50 [CI 0.45,0.55]; p < 0.001) and increased the proportion in care (with or without repeat TIs) (82.7% versus 73.4%, RD +9.3% [CI 8.6,10.0], adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.14 [CI 1.05,1.25]; p = 0.002) at 12-months after return. Overall, the PCC intervention increased the proportion in care 12-months after a TI from 51.5% to 60.1% (RD +8.7% [CI 8.0,9.3], aRR 1.19 [CI 1.05,1.35]; p = 0.008). Effect sizes were similar in direction and magnitude in multiple sensitivity analyses with varying precision. Limitations included post-hoc analysis and those associated with stepped-wedge design. CONCLUSIONS: The PCC intervention likely improved rates of return to care after TIs, sustained reengagement after return, and overall retention among individuals with TIs. Strategies targeting caring aspects of HCW behavior and client experience may help lower barriers to and address persistent challenges with reengagement in care.
Estimating potential silent transfer using baseline viral load measures among people presenting as new to HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: a cross-sectional study.
(2023-May-25) Pry, Jake M.; Mwila, Chilambwe ; Kapesa, Herbert; Mulabe, Musunge; Frimpong, Christiana ; Moono, Misinzo; Savory, Theodora; Bolton-Moore, Carolyn; Herce, Michael E.; Iyer, Shilpa
OBJECTIVES: To estimate potential silent transfer using baseline viral load measures among individuals presenting as new to HIV care in routine HIV clinical settings in Lusaka, Zambia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two large, urban government-operated health facilities supported by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 248 participants with an incident positive HIV rapid test. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was HIV viral suppression at baseline (i.e., potential silent transfer), defined as having a viral load ≤1000 RNA copies(c)/mL at the time of initiating HIV care. We also examined viral suppression at ≤60 c/mL. METHODS: We surveyed and measured baseline HIV viral load as part of the national recent infection testing algorithm among people living with HIV (PLWH) presenting as new to care. Using mixed effects Poisson regression, we identified characteristics among PLWH associated with potential silent transfer. RESULTS: Among the 248 PLWH included, 63% were women with median age of 30, and 66 (27% (66/248)) had viral suppression at ≤1000 c/mL and 53 (21% (53/248)) at ≤60 c/mL thresholds, respectively. Participants aged 40+ years had a significantly higher adjusted prevalence of potential silent transfer (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 2.10; 95% CI: 2.08, 2.13) compared with participants aged 18-24 years. Participants reporting no formal education had a significantly higher adjusted prevalence of potential silent transfer (aPR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.52, 1.75) compared with those completing primary education. Among 57 potential silent transfers who completed a survey, 44 (77%) indicated having tested positive previously at ≥1 of 38 clinics in Zambia. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of PLWH with potential silent transfer points to clinic shopping and/or co-enrolment at multiple care sites simultaneously, suggesting an opportunity to improve care continuity at the time of HIV care entry.
Using best-worst scaling to inform policy decisions in Africa: a literature review.
(2024-Sep-27) Beres, Laura K.; Campoamor, Nicola B.; Hawthorn, Rachael; Mugambi, Melissa L. ; Mulabe, Musunge; Vhlakis, Natlie; Kabongo, Michael; Schuster, Anne; Bridges, John F. P.
BACKGROUND: Stakeholder engagement in policy decision-making is critical to inform required trade-offs, especially in low-and-middle income settings, such as many African countries. Discrete-choice experiments are now commonly used to engage stakeholders in policy decisions, but other methods such as best-worst scaling (BWS), a theory-driven prioritization technique, could be equally important. We sought to document and explore applications of BWS to assess stakeholder priorities in the African context to bring attention to BWS as a method and to assess how and why it is being used to inform policy. METHODS: We conducted a literature review of published applications of BWS for prioritization in Africa. RESULTS: Our study identified 35 studies, with the majority published in the past four years. BWS has most commonly been used in agriculture (43%) and health (34%), although its broad applicability is demonstrated through use in fields influencing social and economic determinants of health, including business, environment, and transportation. Published studies from eastern, western, southern, and northern Africa include a broad range of sample sizes, design choices, and analytical approaches. Most studies are of high quality and high policy relevance. Several studies cited benefits of using BWS, with many of those citing potential limitations rather than observed limitations in their study. CONCLUSIONS: Growing use of the method across the African continent demonstrates its feasibility and utility, recommending it for consideration among researchers, program implementers, policy makers, and funders when conducting preference research to influence policy and improve health systems. REGISTRATION: The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020209745).