Browsing by Author "Ngosa B"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mixed-methods protocol for the WiSSPr study: Women in Sex work, Stigma and psychosocial barriers to Pre-exposure prophylaxis in Zambia.
    (2024-Sep-05) Kumar R; Rao D; Sharma A; Phiri J; Zimba M; Phiri M; Zyambo R; Kalo GM; Chilembo L; Kunda PM; Mulubwa C; Ngosa B; Mugwanya KK; Barrington WE; Herce ME; Musheke M; Tithandizeni Umoyo Network, Lusaka, Zambia.; University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Zambia Sex Workers Alliance, Lusaka, Zambia.; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Epidemiology; Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing; Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Epidemiology, Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia ramya.kumar.mlk@gmail.com.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Lusaka District Health Office, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
    INTRODUCTION: Women engaging in sex work (WESW) have 21 times the risk of HIV acquisition compared with the general population. However, accessing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains challenging, and PrEP initiation and persistence are low due to stigma and related psychosocial factors. The WiSSPr (Women in Sex work, Stigma and PrEP) study aims to (1) estimate the effect of multiple stigmas on PrEP initiation and persistence and (2) qualitatively explore the enablers and barriers to PrEP use for WESW in Lusaka, Zambia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: WiSSPr is a prospective observational cohort study grounded in community-based participatory research principles with a community advisory board (CAB) of key population (KP) civil society organi sations (KP-CSOs) and the Ministry of Health (MoH). We will administer a one-time psychosocial survey vetted by the CAB and follow 300 WESW in the electronic medical record for three months to measure PrEP initiation (#/% ever taking PrEP) and persistence (immediate discontinuation and a medication possession ratio). We will conduct in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 18 women, including 12 WESW and 6 peer navigators who support routine HIV screening and PrEP delivery, in two community hubs serving KPs since October 2021. We seek to value KP communities as equal contributors to the knowledge production process by actively engaging KP-CSOs throughout the research process. Expected outcomes include quantitative measures of PrEP initiation and persistence among WESW, and qualitative insights into the enablers and barriers to PrEP use informed by participants' lived experiences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: WiSSPr was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Zambia (#3650-2023) and University of North Carolina (#22-3147). Participants must give written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated to the CAB, who will determine how to relay them to the community and stakeholders.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Programme science in action: lessons from an observational study of HIV prevention programming for key populations in Lusaka, Zambia.
    (2024-Jul) Sikazwe I; Musheke M; Chiyenu K; Ngosa B; Pry JM; Mulubwa C; Zimba M; Sakala M; Sakala M; Somwe P; Nyirenda G; Savory T; Bolton-Moore C; Herce ME; Tithandizeni Umoyo Network, Lusaka, Zambia.; Zambia Sex Workers Alliance, Lusaka, Zambia.; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.; Intersex Society of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
    INTRODUCTION: Optimizing uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for individuals at risk of HIV acquisition has been challenging despite clear scientific evidence and normative guidelines, particularly for key populations (KPs) such as men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSWs), transgender (TG) people and persons who inject drugs (PWID). Applying an iterative Programme Science cycle, building on the effective programme coverage framework, we describe the approach used by the Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ) to scale up PrEP delivery and address inequities in PrEP access for KP in Lusaka, Zambia. METHODS: In 2019, CIDRZ partnered with 10 local KP civil society organizations (CSOs) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) to offer HIV services within KP-designated community safe spaces. KP CSO partners led KP mobilization, managed safe spaces and delivered peer support; MOH organized clinicians and clinical commodities; and CIDRZ provided technical oversight. In December 2021, we introduced a community-based intervention focused on PrEP delivery in venues where KP socialize. We collected routine programme data from September 2019 to June 2023 using programme-specific tools and the national electronic health record. We estimated the before-after effects of our intervention on PrEP uptake, continuation and equity for KP using descriptive statistics and interrupted time series regression, and used mixed-effects regression to estimate marginal probabilities of PrEP continuity. RESULTS: Most (25,658) of the 38,307 (67.0%) Key Population Investment Fund beneficiaries were reached with HIV prevention services at community-based venues. In total, 23,527 (61.4%) received HIV testing services, with 15,508 (65.9%) testing HIV negative and found PrEP eligible, and 15,241 (98.3%) initiating PrEP. Across all programme quarters and KP types, PrEP uptake was >90%. After introducing venue-based PrEP delivery, PrEP uptake (98.7% after vs. 96.5% before, p < 0.001) and the number of initiations (p = 0.014) increased significantly. The proportion of KP with ≥1 PrEP continuation visit within 6 months of initiation was unchanged post-intervention (46.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.7%, 47.6%) versus pre-intervention (47.2%, 95% CI: 45.4%, 49.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Applying Programme Science principles, we demonstrate how decentralizing HIV prevention services to KP venues and safe spaces in partnership with KP CSOs enabled successful community-based PrEP delivery beyond the reach of traditional facility-based services.