Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of CIDRZ Publications
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Paules Catharine I."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Transplant Infectious Diseases Work Standards—Results From a Mid‐Atlantic Regional Survey
    (2026-8-10) Vissichelli Nicole C.; Thomas Lora; Kumar Rebecca; Paules Catharine I.; Shoham Shmuel; Morales Megan K.
    ABSTRACT Background As transplantation and cellular therapy expand, so must the transplant infectious diseases (TID) workforce; yet little is known about regional or national TID work standards for the existing workforce. This survey of TID clinicians in the mid‐Atlantic region seeks to outline current work standards used to define a 1.0 FTE practice. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study evaluating the current compensation structure for TID providers, conducted July–October 2025 via REDCap survey distributed to the Mid‐Atlantic Transplant Infectious Diseases Society (MATIDS). The survey consisted of 18 multiple‐choice questions with ranges for quantitative answers. Data were analyzed in Excel and R and descriptive statistics were used. Results Approximately one‐third of eligible members responded, the majority being from academic medical centers. At least eight regional medical groups were represented. Physicians reported a mix of RVU and time‐based models for defining their work standards. For a 1.0 FTE, most reported 26–30 weeks of inpatient service in academic centers and 31–35 for all respondents. Among those with set RVU targets, most were < 2000–5000. Nearly all physicians receive subsidized cFTE support, averaging 0.6 for academic faculty and 0.7 across all practice settings. Non‐billable work supporting the transplant program was ubiquitous. Conclusion TID work standards are often identical to those of general ID colleagues, despite substantial differences in patient population and consultation volume/practices, as well as non‐billable work for the transplant program. To fairly compensate TID work, retain physicians, and attract new specialists to this increasingly complex field, we must define work standards tailored to TID. image

CIDRZ copyright © 2026

  • Send Feedback