Browsing by Author "Sheneberger R"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Africa's defining moment: the time to lead the HIV response is now.(2025-May) Chola M; Sikazwe I; Robalo M; Oduro-Bonsrah P; Coutinho A; Sheneberger R; Ozoemene J; M'pele P; Nyamweya D; Stevenson S; Raphael Y; Nene SM; Ataguba J; Chakroun M; Sidibe M; Kofi Annan Global Health Leadership Program, Africa Centres for Disease Control, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.; Institute for Global Health and Development, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.; Africa Working Group, The G4 Alliance, Cotonou, Benin.; African Health Economics and Policy Association, Accra, Ghana; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.; SCMN Global Health Consulting, Pretoria, South Africa.; HIV Trust Fund of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria; Nigeria Business Coalition Against AIDS, Lagos, Nigeria.; SECTION27, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.; Africa Medicines Agency, Bamako, Mali.; Operation Triple Zero, Nairobi, Kenya.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia. Electronic address: Mumbi.chola@cidrz.org.; Advocates for the Prevention of HIV in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)Item Comparative outcomes of tenofovir-based and zidovudine-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in Lusaka, Zambia.(2011-Dec-15) Chi BH; Mwango A; Giganti MJ; Sikazwe I; Moyo C; Schuttner L; Mulenga LB; Bolton-Moore C; Chintu NT; Sheneberger R; Stringer EM; Stringer JS; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. bchi@uab.edu; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)BACKGROUND: Although tenofovir (TDF) is a common component of antiretroviral therapy (ART), recent evidence suggests inferior outcomes when it is combined with nevirapine (NVP). METHODS: We compared outcomes among patients initiating TDF + emtricitabine or lamivudine (XTC) + NVP, TDF + XTC + efavirenz (EFV), zidovudine (ZDV) + lamuvidine (3TC) + NVP, and ZDV + 3TC + EFV. We categorized drug exposure by initial ART dispensation by a time-varying analysis that accounted for drug substitutions and by predominant exposure (>75% of drug dispensations) during an initial window period. Risks for death and program failure were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. All regimens were compared with ZDV + 3TC + NVP. RESULTS: Between July 2007 and November 2010, 18,866 treatment-naive adults initiated ART: 18.2% on ZDV + 3TC + NVP, 1.8% on ZDV + 3TC + EFV, 36.2% on TDF + XTC + NVP, and 43.8% on TDF + XTC + EFV. When exposure was categorized by initial prescription, patients on TDF + XTC + NVP [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 2.06] had a higher post-90-day mortality. TDF + XTC + NVP was also associated with an elevated risk for mortality when exposure was categorized as time-varying (AHR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.95) or by predominant exposure over the first 90 days (AHR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.09 to 3.34). However, these findings were not consistently observed across sensitivity analyses or when program failure was used as a secondary outcome. CONCLUSION: TDF + XTC + NVP was associated with higher mortality when compared with ZDV + 3TC + NVP but not consistently across sensitivity analyses. These findings may be explained in part by inherent limitations to our retrospective approach, including residual confounding. Further research is urgently needed to compare the effectiveness of ART regimens in use in resource-constrained settings.Item Early clinical and programmatic outcomes with tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy in Zambia.(2010-May-01) Chi BH; Mwango A; Giganti M; Mulenga LB; Tambatamba-Chapula B; Reid SE; Bolton-Moore C; Chintu N; Mulenga PL; Stringer EM; Sheneberger R; Mwaba P; Stringer JS; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. bchi@uab.edu; CIDRZ; Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)BACKGROUND: In July 2007, amid some controversy over cost, Zambia was the first African country to introduce tenofovir (TDF) as a component of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) on a wide scale. METHODS: We compared drug substitutions, mortality, and "programmatic failure" among adults starting TDF-, zidovudine (ZDV)-, and stavudine (d4T)-containing ART. Programmatic failure was defined as death, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up. RESULTS: Between July 2007 and January 2009, 10,485 adults initiated ART (66% on TDF, 23% on ZDV, 11% on d4T), with a median follow-up time of 239 (interquartile range 98, 385) days. Those starting TDF were more likely to be male and more likely to have indicators of severe disease at baseline. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, ZDV- (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.30-3.28) and d4T-based regimens (AHR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.55-2.38) were associated with higher risk for drug substitution when compared with TDF-based regimens. Similar hazards were noted for overall mortality (ZDV: AHR = 0 .81, 95% CI = 0.62-1.06; d4T: AHR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.74-1.43) and programmatic failure (ZDV: AHR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88-1.11; d4T: AHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.96-1.28) when compared with TDF. CONCLUSIONS: TDF is associated with similar clinical and programmatic outcomes as ZDV and d4T but appears to be better tolerated. Although further evaluation is needed, these results are encouraging and support Zambia's policy decision.Item Peer community health workers improve HIV testing and ART linkage among key populations in Zambia: retrospective observational results from the Z-CHECK project, 2019-2020.(2022-Nov) Lindsay BR; Mwango L; Toeque MG; Malupande SL; Nkhuwa E; Moonga CN; Chilambe A; Sakala H; Kafunda I; Olowski P; Olufunso A; Okuku J; Kancheya N; Mumba D; Hachaambwa L; Sheneberger R; Blanco N; Lavoie MC; Claassen CW; Center for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Centre for Infectious Disease, Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.; National AIDS/TB/STI Council Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.; Center for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Ciheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.INTRODUCTION: Zambia has made tremendous progress towards HIV epidemic control; however, gaps remain among key populations (KPs), such as female sex workers (FSWs), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID) and people in prisons and enclosed settings due to cultural, social and legal barriers. The University of Maryland, Baltimore Zambia Community HIV Epidemic Control for Key Populations (Z-CHECK) project aimed to improve HIV case-finding, linkage and treatment adherence at the community level for KPs in Zambia. We describe Z-CHECK strategies and examine HIV positivity yield and antiretroviral therapy (ART) linkage among KPs to inform ongoing programme improvement. METHODS: Z-CHECK recruited, trained and deployed peer community health workers (CHWs) for KP groups, with ongoing mentorship in community engagement. CHWs offered HIV testing in safe spaces and escorted newly HIV-diagnosed clients for same-day ART initiation. Z-CHECK also reached out to KP community leaders and gatekeepers for KP mobilization and trained healthcare workers (HCWs) on KP services and sensitivity. We conducted a retrospective observational review of routinely collected aggregate data for KPs aged ≥15 years at high risk for HIV transmission across five districts in Zambia from January 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: Z-CHECK provided HIV testing for 9211 KPs, of whom 2227 were HIV positive (positivity yield, 24%). Among these, 1901 (85%) were linked to ART; linkage for MSM, FSW, PWID and people in prisons and enclosed settings was 95%, 89%, 86% and 65%, respectively. Programme strategies that contributed to high positivity yield and linkage included the use of peer KP CHWs, social network testing strategies and opportunities for same-day ART initiation. Challenges to programme implementation included stigma and discrimination among HCWs, as well as KP CHW attrition, which may be explained by high mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Peer CHWs were highly effective at reaching KP communities, identifying persons living with HIV and linking them to care. Engaging KP community gatekeepers resulted in high diffusion of health messages and increased access to health resources. The mobility of CHWs and HCWs is a challenge for programme implementation. Innovative interventions are needed to support PWID and people in prisons and enclosed settings.