Global health reciprocal innovation to address mental health and well-being: strategies used and lessons learnt.

dc.contributor.affiliationResearch Department, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationBehavioral Science & Integrative Neuroscience Research Branch, Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationSparkman Center for Global Health and Department of Health Policy and Organization, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama, USA jmturan@uab.edu.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto de Medicina Tropical and Salud Global, Universidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
dc.contributor.affiliationCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationResearch Support Centre, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
dc.contributor.affiliationFriendship Bench Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
dc.contributor.affiliationOffice of AIDS Research, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family and Population and Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
dc.contributor.affiliationCIDRZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.contributor.authorTuran JM
dc.contributor.authorVinikoor MJ
dc.contributor.authorSu AY
dc.contributor.authorRangel-Gomez M
dc.contributor.authorSweetland A
dc.contributor.authorVerhey R
dc.contributor.authorChibanda D
dc.contributor.authorPaulino-Ramírez R
dc.contributor.authorBest C
dc.contributor.authorMasquillier C
dc.contributor.authorvan Olmen J
dc.contributor.authorGaist P
dc.contributor.authorKohrt BA
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:40:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-Nov
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades there have been major advances in the development of interventions promoting mental health and well-being in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), including delivery of care by non-specialist providers, incorporation of mobile technologies and development of multilevel community-based interventions. Growing inequities in mental health have led to calls to adopt similar strategies in high-income countries (HIC), learning from LMIC. To overcome shared challenges, it is crucial for projects implementing these strategies in different global settings to learn from one another. Our objective was to examine cases in which mental health and well-being interventions originating in or conceived for LMIC were implemented in the USA. The cases included delivery of psychological interventions by non-specialists, HIV-related stigma reduction programmes, substance use mitigation strategies and interventions to promote parenting skills and family functioning. We summarise commonly used strategies, barriers, benefits and lessons learnt for the transfer of these innovative practices among LMIC and HIC. Common strategies included intervention delivery by non-specialists and use of digital modalities to facilitate training and increase reach. Common barriers included lack of reimbursement mechanisms for care delivered by non-specialists and resistance from professional societies. Despite US investigators' involvement in most of the original research in LMIC, only a few cases directly involved LMIC researchers in US implementation. In order to achieve greater equity in global mental health and well-being, more efforts and targeted funding are needed to develop best practices for global health reciprocal innovation and iterative learning in HIC and LMIC.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013572
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10199
dc.sourceBMJ global health
dc.titleGlobal health reciprocal innovation to address mental health and well-being: strategies used and lessons learnt.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
article.pdf
Size:
279.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections