Chest X-ray Analysis With Deep Learning-Based Software as a Triage Test for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.

dc.contributor.affiliationSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.contributor.affiliationIRD Global, Singapore.
dc.contributor.affiliationWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
dc.contributor.affiliationDépartement des Médicaments et Santé des Populations, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Lung Infection and Immunity Unit, Division of Pulmonology and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
dc.contributor.affiliationClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationMcGill International TB Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
dc.contributor.affiliationInteractive Research & Development (IRD) Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Tropical Medicine, Center of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartments of Medicine & Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
dc.contributor.affiliationZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationCIDRZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.contributor.authorTavaziva G
dc.contributor.authorHarris M
dc.contributor.authorAbidi SK
dc.contributor.authorGeric C
dc.contributor.authorBreuninger M
dc.contributor.authorDheda K
dc.contributor.authorEsmail A
dc.contributor.authorMuyoyeta M
dc.contributor.authorReither K
dc.contributor.authorMajidulla A
dc.contributor.authorKhan AJ
dc.contributor.authorCampbell JR
dc.contributor.authorDavid PM
dc.contributor.authorDenkinger C
dc.contributor.authorMiller C
dc.contributor.authorNathavitharana R
dc.contributor.authorPai M
dc.contributor.authorBenedetti A
dc.contributor.authorAhmad Khan F
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-Apr-28
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Automated radiologic analysis using computer-aided detection software (CAD) could facilitate chest X-ray (CXR) use in tuberculosis diagnosis. There is little to no evidence on the accuracy of commercially available deep learning-based CAD in different populations, including patients with smear-negative tuberculosis and people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PLWH). METHODS: We collected CXRs and individual patient data (IPD) from studies evaluating CAD in patients self-referring for tuberculosis symptoms with culture or nucleic acid amplification testing as the reference. We reanalyzed CXRs with three CAD programs (CAD4TB version (v) 6, Lunit v3.1.0.0, and qXR v2). We estimated sensitivity and specificity within each study and pooled using IPD meta-analysis. We used multivariable meta-regression to identify characteristics modifying accuracy. RESULTS: We included CXRs and IPD of 3727/3967 participants from 4/7 eligible studies. 17% (621/3727) were PLWH. 17% (645/3727) had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. Despite using the same threshold score for classifying CXR in every study, sensitivity and specificity varied from study to study. The software had similar unadjusted accuracy (at 90% pooled sensitivity, pooled specificities were: CAD4TBv6, 56.9% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 51.7-61.9]; Lunit, 54.1% [95% CI: 44.6-63.3]; qXRv2, 60.5% [95% CI: 51.7-68.6]). Adjusted absolute differences in pooled sensitivity between PLWH and HIV-uninfected participants were: CAD4TBv6, -13.4% [-21.1, -6.9]; Lunit, +2.2% [-3.6, +6.3]; qXRv2: -13.4% [-21.5, -6.6]; between smear-negative and smear-positive tuberculosis was: were CAD4TBv6, -12.3% [-19.5, -6.1]; Lunit, -17.2% [-24.6, -10.5]; qXRv2, -16.6% [-24.4, -9.9]. Accuracy was similar to human readers. CONCLUSIONS: For CAD CXR analysis to be implemented as a high-sensitivity tuberculosis rule-out test, users will need threshold scores identified from their own patient populations and stratified by HIV and smear status.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciab639
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10355
dc.sourceClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
dc.titleChest X-ray Analysis With Deep Learning-Based Software as a Triage Test for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Files

Collections