Improved Retention With 6-Month Clinic Return Intervals for Stable Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in Zambia.

dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of HIV, ID, and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
dc.contributor.affiliationDivision of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley.
dc.contributor.affiliationCIDRZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.contributor.authorMody A
dc.contributor.authorRoy M
dc.contributor.authorSikombe K
dc.contributor.authorSavory T
dc.contributor.authorHolmes C
dc.contributor.authorBolton-Moore C
dc.contributor.authorPadian N
dc.contributor.authorSikazwe I
dc.contributor.authorGeng E
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-Jan-06
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Extending appointment intervals for stable HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa can reduce patient opportunity costs and decongest overcrowded facilities. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of stable HIV-infected adults (on treatment with CD4 >200 cells/μL for more than 6 months) who presented for clinic visits in Lusaka, Zambia. We used multilevel, mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for patient characteristics, including prior retention, to assess the association between scheduled appointment intervals and subsequent missed visits (>14 days late to next visit), gaps in medication (>14 days late to next pharmacy refill), and loss to follow-up (LTFU; >90 days late to next visit). RESULTS: A total of 62084 patients (66.6% female, median age 38, median CD4 438 cells/μL) made 501281 visits while stable on antiretroviral therapy. Most visits were scheduled around 1-month (25.0% clinical, 44.4% pharmacy) or 3-month intervals (49.8% clinical, 35.2% pharmacy), with fewer patients scheduled at 6-month intervals (10.3% clinical, 0.4% pharmacy). After adjustment and compared to patients scheduled to return in 1 month, patients with six-month clinic return intervals were the least likely to miss visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.24); miss medication pickups (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.39-0.57), and become LTFU prior to the next visit (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month clinic return intervals were associated with decreased lateness, gaps in medication, and LTFU in stable HIV-infected patients and may represent a promising strategy to reduce patient burdens and decongest clinics.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/cix756
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10538
dc.sourceClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
dc.titleImproved Retention With 6-Month Clinic Return Intervals for Stable Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in Zambia.

Files

Collections