HIV programme sustainability in Southern and Eastern Africa and the changing role of external assistance for health.

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), 34620 Lukasu Road, Mass Media, Lusaka 10101, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationSCMN Global Health Consulting, 261 Middel Street, Pretoria 0181, South Africa.
dc.contributor.authorNeel AH
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez DC
dc.contributor.authorSikazwe I
dc.contributor.authorPillay Y
dc.contributor.authorBarron P
dc.contributor.authorPereira SK
dc.contributor.authorMakakole-Nene S
dc.contributor.authorBennett SC
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:43:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-Jan-23
dc.description.abstractHigh human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-prevalence countries in Southern and Eastern Africa continue to receive substantial external assistance (EA) for HIV programming, yet countries are at risk of transitioning out of HIV aid without achieving epidemic control. We sought to address two questions: (1) to what extent has HIV EA in the region been programmed and delivered in a way that supports long-term sustainability and (2) how should development agencies change operational approaches to support long-term, sustainable HIV control? We conducted 20 semi-structured key informant interviews with global and country-level respondents coupled with an analysis of Global Fund budget data for Malawi, Uganda, and Zambia (from 2017 until the present). We assessed EA practice along six dimensions of sustainability, namely financial, epidemiological, programmatic, rights-based, structural and political sustainability. Our respondents described HIV systems' vulnerability to donor departure, as well as how development partner priorities and practices have created challenges to promoting long-term HIV control. The challenges exacerbated by EA patterns include an emphasis on treatment over prevention, limiting effects on new infection rates; resistance to service integration driven in part by 'winners' under current EA patterns and challenges in ensuring coverage for marginalized populations; persistent structural barriers to effectively serving key populations and limited capacity among organizations best positioned to respond to community needs; and the need for advocacy given the erosion of political commitment by the long-term and substantive nature of HIV EA. Our recommendations include developing a robust investment case for primary prevention, providing operational support for integration processes, investing in local organizations and addressing issues of political will. While strategies must be locally crafted, our paper provides initial suggestions for how EA partners could change operational approaches to support long-term HIV control and the achievement of universal health coverage.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czad091
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10810
dc.sourceHealth policy and planning
dc.titleHIV programme sustainability in Southern and Eastern Africa and the changing role of external assistance for health.

Files

Collections