Implementation and Operational Research: Reconstructing the PMTCT Cascade Using Cross-sectional Household Survey Data: The PEARL Study.

dc.contributor.affiliation*University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; †Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; ‡Cameroon Baptist Health Convention Health Board, Bamenda, Cameroon; §University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; ‖INSERM, Centre INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; ¶University of Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; #Programme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire; **Zambian Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; and ††World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
dc.contributor.affiliationCIDRZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.contributor.authorChi BH
dc.contributor.authorTih PM
dc.contributor.authorZanolini A
dc.contributor.authorStinson K
dc.contributor.authorEkouevi DK
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee D
dc.contributor.authorWelty TK
dc.contributor.authorBweupe M
dc.contributor.authorShaffer N
dc.contributor.authorDabis F
dc.contributor.authorStringer EM
dc.contributor.authorStringer JS
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:42:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-Sep-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Given the ambitious targets to reduce pediatric AIDS worldwide, ongoing assessment of programs to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) is critical. The concept of a "PMTCT cascade" has been used widely to identify bottlenecks in program implementation; however, most efforts to reconstruct the cascade have relied on facility-based approaches that may limit external validity. METHODS: We analyzed data from the PEARL household survey, which measured PMTCT effectiveness in 26 communities across Zambia, South Africa, Cote d'Ivoire, and Cameroon. We recruited women who reported a delivery in the past 2 years. Among mothers confirmed to be HIV infected at the time of survey, we reconstructed the PMTCT cascade with self-reported participant information. We also analyzed data about the child's vital status; for those still alive, HIV testing was performed by DNA polymerase chain reaction testing. RESULTS: Of the 976 eligible women, only 355 (36%) completed every step of the PMTCT cascade. Among the 621 mother-child pairs who did not, 22 (4%) reported never seeking antenatal care, 103 (17%) were not tested for HIV during pregnancy, 395 (64%) reported testing but never received their HIV-positive result, 48 (8%) did not receive maternal antiretroviral prophylaxis, and 53 (9%) did not receive infant antiretroviral prophylaxis. The lowest prevalence of infant HIV infection or death was observed in those completing the cascade (10%, 95% confidence interval: 7% to 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts to measure population PMTCT impact should incorporate dimensions explored in the PEARL study-including HIV testing of HIV-exposed children in household surveys-to better understand program effectiveness.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/QAI.0000000000000718
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10620
dc.sourceJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)
dc.titleImplementation and Operational Research: Reconstructing the PMTCT Cascade Using Cross-sectional Household Survey Data: The PEARL Study.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
article.pdf
Size:
849.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections