Costs and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive tuberculosis case finding strategy in Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliation | Centre For Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia. | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jo Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Kagujje M | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson K | |
dc.contributor.author | Dowdy D | |
dc.contributor.author | Hangoma P | |
dc.contributor.author | Chiliukutu L | |
dc.contributor.author | Muyoyeta M | |
dc.contributor.author | Sohn H | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-23T11:40:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Active-case finding (ACF) programs have an important role in addressing case detection gaps and halting tuberculosis (TB) transmission. Evidence is limited on the cost-effectiveness of ACF interventions, particularly on how their value is impacted by different operational, epidemiological and patient care-seeking patterns. METHODS: We evaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of a combined facility and community-based ACF intervention in Zambia that utilized mobile chest X-ray with computer-aided reading/interpretation software and laboratory-based Xpert MTB/RIF testing. Programmatic costs (in 2018 US dollars) were assessed from the health system perspective using prospectively collected cost and operational data. Cost-effectiveness of the ACF intervention was assessed as the incremental cost per TB death averted over a five-year time horizon using a multi-stage Markov state-transition model reflecting patient symptom-associated care-seeking and TB care under ACF compared to passive care. RESULTS: Over 18 months of field operations, the ACF intervention costed $435 to diagnose and initiate treatment for one person with TB. After accounting for patient symptom-associated care-seeking patterns in Zambia, we estimate that this one-time ACF intervention would incrementally diagnose 407 (7,207 versus 6,800) TB patients and avert 502 (611 versus 1,113) TB-associated deaths compared to the status quo (passive case finding), at an incremental cost of $2,284 per death averted over the next five-year period. HIV/TB mortality rate, patient symptom-associated care-seeking probabilities in the absence of ACF, and the costs of ACF patient screening were key drivers of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: A one-time comprehensive ACF intervention simultaneously operating in public health clinics and corresponding catchment communities can have important medium-term impact on case-finding and be cost-effective in Zambia. The value of such interventions increases if targeted to populations with high HIV/TB mortality, substantial barriers (both behavioral and physical) to care-seeking exist, and when ACF interventions can optimize screening by achieving operational efficiency. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0256531 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10344 | |
dc.source | PloS one | |
dc.title | Costs and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive tuberculosis case finding strategy in Zambia. |