Global HIV prevention, care and treatment services for children: a cross-sectional survey from the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium.

dc.contributor.affiliationCenter for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation Health (CERPOP), Inserm, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Arnhold Institute for Global Health, New York, New York, USA rachel.vreeman@mssm.edu.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
dc.contributor.affiliationDépartement de Pédiatrie, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
dc.contributor.affiliationIndiana University Center for Global Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre National de Référence en Matière de VIH/SIDA, Bujumbura, Burundi.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Paediatrics, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Arnhold Institute for Global Health, New York, New York, USA.
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
dc.contributor.affiliationCIDRZ
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.contributor.authorVreeman RC
dc.contributor.authorYiannoutsos CT
dc.contributor.authorYusoff NKN
dc.contributor.authorWester CW
dc.contributor.authorEdmonds A
dc.contributor.authorOfner S
dc.contributor.authorDavies MA
dc.contributor.authorLeroy V
dc.contributor.authorLumbiganon P
dc.contributor.authorde Menezes Succi RC
dc.contributor.authorTwizere C
dc.contributor.authorBrown S
dc.contributor.authorBolton-Moore C
dc.contributor.authorTakassi OE
dc.contributor.authorScanlon M
dc.contributor.authorMartin R
dc.contributor.authorWools-Kaloustian K
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T11:40:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-Mar-13
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To assess access children with HIV have to comprehensive HIV care services, to longitudinally evaluate the implementation and scale-up of services, and to use site services and clinical cohort data to explore whether access to these services influences retention in care. METHODS: A cross-sectional standardised survey was completed in 2014-2015 by sites providing paediatric HIV care across regions of the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. We developed a comprehensiveness score based on the WHO's nine categories of essential services to categorise sites as 'low' (0-5), 'medium', (6-7) or 'high' (8-9). When available, comprehensiveness scores were compared with scores from a 2009 survey. We used patient-level data with site services to investigate the relationship between the comprehensiveness of services and retention. RESULTS: Survey data from 174 IeDEA sites in 32 countries were analysed. Of the WHO essential services, sites were most likely to offer antiretroviral therapy (ART) provision and counselling (n=173; 99%), co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (168; 97%), prevention of perinatal transmission services (167; 96%), outreach for patient engagement and follow-up (166; 95%), CD4 cell count testing (126; 88%), tuberculosis screening (151; 87%) and select immunisation services (126; 72%). Sites were less likely to offer nutrition/food support (97; 56%), viral load testing (99; 69%) and HIV counselling and testing (69; 40%). 10% of sites rated 'low', 59% 'medium' and 31% 'high' in the comprehensiveness score. The mean comprehensiveness of services score increased significantly from 5.6 in 2009 to 7.3 in 2014 (p<0.001; n=30). Patient-level analysis of lost to follow-up after ART initiation estimated the hazard was highest in sites rated 'low' and lowest in sites rated 'high'. CONCLUSION: This global assessment suggests the potential care impact of scaling-up and sustaining comprehensive paediatric HIV services. Meeting recommendations for comprehensive HIV services should remain a global priority.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069399
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/10257
dc.sourceBMJ open
dc.titleGlobal HIV prevention, care and treatment services for children: a cross-sectional survey from the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
article.pdf
Size:
560.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections