Modelling African Swine Fever Transmission and Epidemiology: A Scoping Review of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Machine Learning Approaches

dc.contributor.authorLigue-Sabio Kim Dianne B.
dc.contributor.authorNazarathy Yoni
dc.contributor.authorDo Kien Quoc
dc.contributor.authorFuruya-Kanamori Luis
dc.contributor.authorSucol Yusuf A.
dc.contributor.authorSartorius Benn
dc.contributor.authorLau Colleen L.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-17T06:27:20Z
dc.date.issued2026-8-14
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>African swine fever (ASF) is a viral disease of domestic and wild pigs that has re-emerged as a major transboundary disease. Modelling using mechanistic, statistical, and machine learning (ML) approaches plays a key role in understanding ASF transmission and informing disease control, but the literature remains fragmented. To synthesise global ASF modelling efforts, we systematically reviewed studies applying these three approaches. We examined temporal and geographic trends, modelling objectives, explanatory variables, and model evaluation practices. A total of 151 papers published through 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Mechanistic (54.3%) and statistical (40.4%) approaches predominated, whereas ML (9.3%) was increasingly applied in recent years. Mechanistic models were primarily used to assess control strategies (48.8%) and transmission drivers (41.5%), statistical models to identify risk factors (63.9%) and spatiotemporal spread (32.8%), and ML for environmental suitability modelling (64.3%). Most were published from 2011 (99.3%) and focused on Europe (43.0%) and Asia (26.5%). Model evaluation remained inconsistent, with mechanistic papers frequently lacking model output uncertainty quantification (47.0%) and statistical papers often omitting model adequacy assessment (49.2%) and assumption checking (50.8%). Overall, ASF modelling approaches have developed complementary methodological roles, while geographic underrepresentation, limited representation of some transmission pathways, and inconsistent model evaluation remain important gaps.</jats:p>
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/tropicalmed11080228
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/13433
dc.identifier.uri.pubmedhttps://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11080228
dc.relation.affiliationFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
dc.relation.affiliationDepartment of Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science, College of Science and Mathematics, University of the Philippines Mindanao, Davao City 8022, Philippines
dc.relation.affiliationSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
dc.relation.affiliationSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
dc.relation.affiliationFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
dc.relation.affiliationUPLB Climate and Disaster Risks Studies Center, School of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños 4031, Philippines
dc.relation.affiliationFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
dc.relation.affiliationFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
dc.sourceTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
dc.titleModelling African Swine Fever Transmission and Epidemiology: A Scoping Review of Mechanistic, Statistical, and Machine Learning Approaches

Files

Collections