Validation of a National Pediatric HIV Risk Screening Tool at 31 Health Facilities in Zambia

dc.contributor.authorCanepa, Hannah M.
dc.contributor.authorMedley, Amy
dc.contributor.authorGutreuter, Steve
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Helen
dc.contributor.authorItoh, Megumi
dc.contributor.authorAholou, Tiffiany
dc.contributor.authorRabold, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorTorre, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorNkwemu, Kennedy
dc.contributor.authorChisuwo, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorHaamuleya, Francis
dc.contributor.authorLungu, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorHansombo, Moono
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Rob
dc.contributor.authorVlahakis, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorChisenga, Tina
dc.contributor.authorMulenga, Lloyd
dc.contributor.authorMbulo, Levi
dc.contributor.authorGross, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-09T13:45:55Z
dc.date.issued2026-9-7
dc.description.abstractBackground: To improve testing efficiency, Zambia introduced a national pediatric human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Risk Screening Tool (HRST) in 2019. However, concerns about its sensitivity led to its suspension in 2021 pending formal evaluation. We therefore undertook a formal validation of this tool to assess its diagnostic performance. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation from February 2021 to March 2022 in 31 health facilities across Lusaka, Southern and Western Provinces. Children aged 2-14 years were screened using the HRST, and all subsequently underwent HIV testing to estimate the tool's sensitivity and specificity. L1-regularized logistic regression was used to identify the most predictive screening questions to develop an optimized tool. Focus group discussions with 85 healthcare providers explored implementation experiences. We also estimated unit costs for HRST-based screening and universal testing and compared these with published cost estimates for provider-assisted HIV self-testing. Results: Among 15,431 children tested, 90 (0.58%) were HIV-positive. The 6-question HRST demonstrated 80.0% sensitivity and 71.0% specificity. An optimized 4-question tool showed similar performance (77.8% sensitivity, 73.2% specificity). Providers reported that the HRST supported targeted testing and workflow efficiency, but highlighted challenges related to consent, disclosure and caregiver knowledge. Estimated unit costs per child tested were $2.25 for universal testing, $0.39 for HRST-based screening and $3.08 for HIV self-testing. Conclusion: Although the HRST improves testing efficiency, its moderate sensitivity underscores the risk of missed diagnoses when used alone. Cost and implementation findings support a differentiated pediatric HIV testing strategy that deploys universal testing, risk-based screening, or HIV self-testing based on local capacity and resource constraints.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/inf.0000000000005401
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/13585
dc.identifier.uri.pubmedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0000000000005401
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationSouthern Provincial Health Office, Zambia Ministry of Health, Choma, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationWestern Provincial Health Office, Zambia Ministry of Health, Solwezi, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationCatholic Relief Services, Lusaka, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationLusaka Provincial Health Office, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.relation.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationNational AIDS Control Program, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.relation.affiliationNational AIDS Control Program, Zambia Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
dc.sourcePediatric Infectious Disease Journal
dc.titleValidation of a National Pediatric HIV Risk Screening Tool at 31 Health Facilities in Zambia

Files

Collections