Design and feasibility considerations for a phase 3 efficacy trial of the M72/AS01

dc.contributor.authorDagnew AF
dc.contributor.authorNoble R
dc.contributor.authorCinar A
dc.contributor.authorBurhan E
dc.contributor.authorChurchyard G
dc.contributor.authorFairlie L
dc.contributor.authorHanekom WA
dc.contributor.authorMuyoyeta M
dc.contributor.authorMwandumba HC
dc.contributor.authorNduba V
dc.contributor.authorCurran M
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt AC
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-06T06:36:12Z
dc.date.issued2026-Jul-11
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: M72/AS01 METHODS: We conducted event-driven simulations using lower bound (LB) of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for VE(D). For IGRA-positive participants, assumptions included 1:1 randomization, 9000 participants/arm, 0.4% TB incidence/year, 55% true VE(D), 5% dropout/year, and two-year enrollment. Enrollment irrespective of baseline IGRA status (mixed IGRA-status population) and IGRA-negative-only scenarios were explored to estimate sample sizes and trial duration. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that 110 events rule out a VE(D) 95% CI LB ≤10%, and 185 events rule out ≤25%, assuming ≥90% power and a true VE(D) of 55%. With 18,000 IGRA-positive participants, simulations projected a 90% probability of accruing 110 events within 3.5 to 4 years and 185 within 5.5 to 6 years. In the mixed IGRA-status population, few endpoints occurred among IGRA-negative participants, yielding insufficient power. Standalone VE(D) evaluation in IGRA-negative participants required large sample sizes (approximately 134,800) and prolonged timelines, indicating infeasibility. Accordingly, the selected primary objective of the phase 3 trial was to confirm VE(D) in IGRA-positive HIV-negative participants using LB of 95% CI for VE(D) > 10% after 110 events; secondary objectives include safety and immunogenicity in HIV-negative IGRA-positive; HIV-negative IGRA-negative; and HIV-positive individuals irrespective of IGRA status. CONCLUSIONS: An IGRA-positive-enriched, event-driven phase 3 trial is feasible to confirm VE(D) of M72/AS01
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128690
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/12938
dc.identifier.uri.pubmedhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42119392/
dc.relation.affiliationGates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: alemnew.dagnew@gatesmri.org.
dc.relation.affiliationGates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
dc.relation.affiliationGates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
dc.relation.affiliationPulmonary Mycosis Centre, Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Persahabatan Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Respiratory Programmatic Implementation and Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia.
dc.relation.affiliationAurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
dc.relation.affiliationWits RHI, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
dc.relation.affiliationAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
dc.relation.affiliationCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ)
dc.relation.affiliationMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Research Programme, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
dc.relation.affiliationKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Respiratory Diseases Research (CRDR), Nairobi, Kenya.
dc.relation.affiliationGates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
dc.relation.affiliationGates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
dc.sourceVaccine
dc.titleDesign and feasibility considerations for a phase 3 efficacy trial of the M72/AS01

Files

Collections