Bridging the Gap Between General and Transplant Infectious Disease Practice

dc.contributor.authorWalker Jeremey
dc.contributor.authorEichenberger Emily
dc.contributor.authorPergam Steven
dc.contributor.authorMalinis Maricar
dc.contributor.authorZimmer Andrea J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-06T06:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2026-6-2
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:label/> <jats:p>The population of iatrogenic immunocompromised individuals is steadily rising as we continue to improve in our ability to manage diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disease, and end‐organ dysfunction, with increasing access to novel agents and transplantation. Enhanced survivorship allows these patients to return to their home communities and lives, leading to an increased number of immunocompromised patients across all healthcare systems. However, expertise in immunocompromised host infectious diseases or transplant ID (TID) is concentrated in urban centers and often in academic settings. In this article, we review three cases to highlight common immunosuppressed groups that can be encountered in any health system: solid organ transplantation, hematologic malignancy, and autoimmune disease. The cases describe common illness scripts and key management considerations for the opportunistic pathogens highlighted. Finally, we outline high‐yield references that can support clinical care of these patients for those interested, whether they be community‐based general infectious diseases clinicians or infectious diseases fellows considering dedicated training in TID. The standards and expectations for immunocompromised infectious diseases training in both general infectious diseases fellowships and dedicated TID training are still being established. There are many societies and groups focused on addressing this need, and the importance of their collaboration and efforts is emphasized by our cases. Immunocompromising conditions are no longer niche, but rather an expected and substantial population of hospitalized patients everywhere. We will need the entire infectious diseases workforce, as well as further recruitment and retention of the next generation of physicians, to meet this ever‐increasing demand.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tid.70250
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.cidrz.org/handle/123456789/12897
dc.identifier.uri.pubmedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70250
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
dc.relation.affiliationAllergy and Infectious Diseases Division Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA
dc.relation.affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Internal Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USA
dc.sourceTransplant Infectious Disease
dc.titleBridging the Gap Between General and Transplant Infectious Disease Practice

Files

Collections